To get a sense of who is truly in control of Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:MVST), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 32% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$704m last week after a 6.9% drop in the share price. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 74% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Microvast Holdings, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Microvast Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
View our latest analysis for Microvast Holdings
NasdaqGS:MVST Ownership Breakdown November 21st 2022
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Microvast Holdings?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
Microvast Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Microvast Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
NasdaqGS:MVST Earnings and Revenue Growth November 21st 2022
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Microvast Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Yang Wu with 28% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Ashmore Investment Management Limited and International Finance Corporation, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.6%.
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
Insider Ownership Of Microvast Holdings
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Microvast Holdings, Inc.. Insiders have a US$211m stake in this US$704m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Microvast Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Private Equity Ownership
With a stake of 7.6%, private equity firms could influence the Microvast Holdings board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
Next Steps:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Microvast Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Microvast Holdings (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
为了弄清谁真正控制了Microvast Holdings,Inc.(纳斯达克代码:MVST),了解该企业的所有权结构是很重要的。持有32%股份的机构拥有该公司的最高股份。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。
因此,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体,上周该公司市值在股价下跌6.9%后跌至7.04亿美元。不用说,最近的亏损进一步增加了股东一年来74%的亏损,可能不会受到很好的欢迎,特别是对于这类股东。机构或“流动性提供者”控制着大笔资金,因此,这类投资者通常对股价走势有很大影响。因此,如果下跌趋势持续下去,机构可能面临出售Microvast Holdings的压力,这可能会对个人投资者产生负面影响。
让我们从下面的图表开始,更深入地研究Microvast Holdings的每种类型的所有者。
查看我们对Microvast Holdings的最新分析
NasdaqGS:MVST所有权明细2022年11月21日
关于Microvast Holdings,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?
许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
Microvast Holdings已经在股票登记处登记了机构。事实上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,查看Microvast Holdings过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
NasdaqGS:MVST收益和收入增长2022年11月21日
对冲基金在Microvast Holdings的股份并不多。看看我们的数据,我们可以看到,第一大股东是拥有28%流通股的CEO杨武。第二和第三大股东是安石投资管理有限公司和国际金融公司,持股比例相同,分别为7.6%。
我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即公司约51%的股份由前5名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。
研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有一些分析师对该股的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。
Microvast Holdings的内部人所有权
公司内部人的定义可能是主观的,而且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个别内部人士,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。
内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
我们最新的数据显示,内部人士持有Microvast Holdings,Inc.相当比例的股份。在这项价值7.04亿美元的业务中,内部人士持有2.11亿美元的股份。我们会说,这表明了与股东的一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍相当小;一些内部人士可能创建了这家企业。你可以点击这里,看看这些内部人士是一直在买入还是卖出。
一般公有制
公众通常是个人投资者,他们持有Microvast Holdings 30%的股份。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
私募股权所有权
私募股权公司持有7.6%的股份,可能会影响Microvast Holdings的董事会。一些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私人股本有时是让管理层承担责任的积极分子。但在其他时候,私募股权公司让公司上市后,它们的股票都卖光了。
接下来的步骤:
拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但为了更好地理解Microvast Holdings,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现Microvast Holdings的3个警告信号(其中1个是重要的!)你应该知道。
如果你像我一样,你可能会想一想这家公司是会增长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份显示分析师对其未来预测的免费报告。
注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。
对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。