share_log

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKG:3316)?

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKG:3316)?

濱江服務集團股份有限公司(HKG:3316)的股權結構如何?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/01 09:42

If you want to know who really controls Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKG:3316), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了濱江服務集團有限公司(HKG:3316),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。機構通常會持有較大公司的股票,我們預計內部人士將持有較小公司相當比例的股份。我通常喜歡看到一定程度的內部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如納西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所説,不要告訴我你的想法,告訴我你的投資組合中有什麼。

With a market capitalization of HK$6.3b, Binjiang Service Group is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are not really that prevalent on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Binjiang Service Group.

市值63億港元的濱江服務集團是一個相當大的規模,因此它很可能在機構投資者的雷達上。看看我們關於所有權組的數據(如下),似乎機構在股票登記處並不是真的那麼普遍。讓我們更深入地挖掘每種類型的所有者,以瞭解更多關於濱江服務集團的情況。

Check out our latest analysis for Binjiang Service Group

查看我們對濱江服務集團的最新分析

SEHK:3316 Ownership Breakdown May 1st 2022
聯交所:3316所有權分類2022年5月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Binjiang Service Group?

關於濱江服務集團,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

Less than 5% of Binjiang Service Group is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

濱江服務集團不到5%的股份由機構投資者持有。這表明,一些基金瞄準了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。如果業務從現在開始變得更強勁,我們可能會看到更多機構熱衷於購買的情況。當多家機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。過去的收入軌跡(如下所示)可以預示未來的增長,但這並不能保證。

SEHK:3316 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2022
聯交所:3316盈利及收入增長2022年5月1日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Binjiang Service Group. Our data shows that Jin Qi is the largest shareholder with 46% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 0.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

對衝基金在濱江服務集團的股份並不多。我們的數據顯示,金琦是第一大股東,持有46%的流通股。作為參考,第二大股東持有約0.3%的流通股,第三大股東持有0.2%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 11 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

更深入地研究我們的所有權數據就會發現,前11名股東總共持有的股份不到登記冊的一半,這表明有一大羣小股東,沒有單一股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然有一些分析師的報道,但該公司可能沒有得到廣泛的報道。因此,它可以獲得更多的關注,在賽道上。

Insider Ownership Of Binjiang Service Group

濱江服務集團的內部人持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own HK$4.5b worth of shares in the HK$6.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看來,內部人士持有濱江服務集團股份有限公司一半以上的股份。這給了他們很大的權力。這意味着他們持有這家市值63億港元的公司價值45億港元的股票。這是很有意義的。大多數人會辯稱,這是積極的,表明了與股東的強烈一致。你可以點擊這裏,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Binjiang Service Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有濱江服務集團27%的股份。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Binjiang Service Group is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,濱江服務集團在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警告信號,您應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能會想一想這家公司是會增長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份顯示分析師對其未來預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論