70年代后美联储执行的多次50BP以上的单次加息幅度均具有较强的先发制人、控制通胀预期,遏制通胀趋势于摇篮的特征。
虽然过往的基本面背景不能类推当下,但浙商证券认为在当前极端通胀压力下,美联储需要通过紧缩预期打压通胀预期,加息幅度加大并前置有助于通胀预期尽快回落,因此5、6月联储议息会议同样存在加息50BP的可能性。
从历史复盘看,5、6月美联储为打压通胀预期存在加息50BP的概率
过往美联储在面临不同场景时均曾选择50BP及以上的单次加息幅度。1994年以及1987年加息周期中超过50BP的大幅加息核心目的均是预防式加息,及时扼杀通胀苗头,实际经济并未过热(产出缺口仍然为负),这一做法与时任美联储主席格林斯潘崇尚「先发制人」(Act Preemptively When You Can)的政策理念有较大关联。
1984年加息周期中大幅加息同样与沃尔克的个人理念有较大关联,沃尔克是亲历大滞胀时期的美联储主席,对潜在通胀风险极为警惕,在通胀失控苗头初现时便大刀阔斧加息,将通胀预期「扼杀在摇篮中」。该轮周期中两次大幅加息,首次的目的主要是打压具有失控苗头的通胀趋势;第二次大幅度加息的主要目的是消除通胀粘性防止反弹。
从停止激进加息(或退出加息周期)的触发因素来看,1994和1987年加息周期的停止均伴随失业率的触底反弹;1984年加息周期的节奏变化主要由通胀所主导,失业率在此期间基本维持平稳,退出加息的主要驱动因素是CPI得到有效控制。
整体来看,70年代后美联储执行的多次50BP以上的单次加息幅度均具有较强的先发制人、控制通胀预期,遏制通胀趋势于摇篮的特征。虽然过往的基本面背景不能类推当下,但浙商证券认为在当前极端通胀压力下,美联储需要通过紧缩预期打压通胀预期,加息幅度加大并前置有助于通胀预期尽快回落,因此5、6月联储议息会议同样存在加息50BP的可能性。
风险提示:疫情超预期导致宽松周期延长;通胀超预期导致美联储快速收紧
Source: Li Chao Macro Research and Asset allocation
Since the 1970s, the Fed has carried out several single interest rate increases above 50BP, all of which have the characteristics of strong pre-emptive strike, controlling inflation expectations and curbing inflation trend in the cradle.
Although the fundamental background of the past cannot be analogous to the present, Zheshang Securities believes that under the current extreme inflationary pressure, the Federal Reserve needs to suppress inflation expectations by tightening expectations, and increasing interest rates and leading them will help inflation expectations fall as soon as possible, so there is also the possibility of raising interest rates 50BP at the Fed meeting in May and June.
From a historical perspective, the Federal Reserve has the probability of raising interest rates by 50BP in May and June to suppress inflation expectations.
In the past, the Fed has chosen a single rate hike of 50BP or above when faced with different scenarios. The core purpose of raising interest rates by more than 50BP in 1994 and 1987 was to raise interest rates preventatively and to kill inflation in time, so that the real economy was not overheated (the output gap was still negative), which had a lot to do with the policy idea of "pre-emptive strike" (Act Preemptively When You Can) advocated by then Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.
The sharp increase in interest rates in the interest rate hike cycle in 1984 is also closely related to Volcker's personal philosophy. Volcker, the chairman of the Federal Reserve who experienced the great stagflation period, was extremely vigilant about the potential risk of inflation and raised interest rates aggressively at the beginning of runaway inflation. stifle inflation expectations in the cradle. There were two sharp interest rate hikes in this cycle, the first was mainly aimed at suppressing the inflationary trend that showed signs of getting out of control, and the main purpose of the second substantial interest rate hike was to eliminate the stickiness of inflation and prevent a rebound.
Judging from the triggering factors of stopping the aggressive interest rate hike (or withdrawing from the interest rate hike cycle), the cessation of the interest rate hike cycle in 1994 and 1987 was accompanied by the bottoming out of unemployment; the rhythm change of the interest rate hike cycle in 1984 was mainly dominated by inflation, and the unemployment rate remained basically stable during this period, and the main driving factor for withdrawing and raising interest rates was the effective control of CPI.
On the whole, many single interest rate increases above 50BP implemented by the Federal Reserve after the 1970s have the characteristics of strong pre-emptive strike, controlling inflation expectations and curbing inflation trend in the cradle. Although the fundamental background of the past cannot be analogous to the present, Zheshang Securities believes that under the current extreme inflationary pressure, the Federal Reserve needs to suppress inflation expectations by tightening expectations, and increasing interest rates and leading them will help inflation expectations fall as soon as possible, so there is also the possibility of raising interest rates 50BP at the Fed meeting in May and June.
Risk Tips:Higher-than-expected epidemic led to prolonged easing cycle; higher-than-expected inflation led to rapid Fed tightening