share_log

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In Lefteris Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:LFTR)?

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In Lefteris Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:LFTR)?

內部人士持有Lefteris Acquisition Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:LFTR)的大量股份嗎?
Simply Wall St. ·  2021/10/04 22:31

The big shareholder groups in Lefteris Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:LFTR) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

中國的大股東團體Lefteris收購公司. (納斯達克:LFTR)對公司擁有控制權。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。沃倫·巴菲特(Warren Buffett)表示,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

With a market capitalization of US$253m, Lefteris Acquisition is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Lefteris Acquisition.

Lefteris Acquisition的市值為2.53億美元,是一隻小盤股,因此可能不為許多機構投資者所熟知。下面我們對公司所有權的分析表明,在股票登記簿上,機構是顯而易見的。我們可以的變焦在不同的所有權集團上,瞭解更多關於Lefteris收購的情況。

Check out our latest analysis for Lefteris AcquisitionNasdaqCM:LFTR Ownership Breakdown October 3rd 2021What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lefteris Acquisition?

查看我們對Lefteris AcquisitionNasdaqCM的最新分析:LFTR所有權細分2021年10月3日關於Lefteris的收購,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

在向自己的投資者報告時,機構通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

We can see that Lefteris Acquisition does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lefteris Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.NasdaqCM:LFTR Earnings and Revenue Growth October 4th 2021

我們可以看到,Lefteris Acquisition確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可以説明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是存在“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Lefteris收購公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的內容。納斯達克CM:LFTR收益和收入增長2021年10月4日

It looks like hedge funds own 11% of Lefteris Acquisition shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Lefteris Acquisition's case, its Top Key Executive, Mark Casady, is the largest shareholder, holding 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.9% and 5.3% of the stock.

看起來對衝基金擁有Lefteris收購公司11%的股份。這一點值得注意,因為對衝基金往往是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。由於行動勝於雄辯,我們認為內部人士持有一家公司的大量股份是一個好兆頭。在收購Lefteris的案例中,其首席執行官馬克·卡薩迪(Mark Casady)是最大的股東,持有20%的流通股。相比之下,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有約5.9%和5.3%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的持股數據就會發現,排名前12位的股東合計擁有50%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.Insider Ownership Of Lefteris Acquisition

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。目前我們沒有得到任何分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。Lefteris收購的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層經理自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小集團帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lefteris Acquisition Corp.. Insiders own US$51m worth of shares in the US$253m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.General Public Ownership

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有Lefteris Acquisition Corp.相當比例的股份。內部人士持有這家市值2.53億美元的公司價值5100萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士如此投入到這項業務中。或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。一般公有制

With a 27% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Lefteris Acquisition. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.Next Steps:

由於擁有27%的股權,普通公眾對Lefteris的收購有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified2 warning signs for Lefteris Acquisition(1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定Lefteris收購的2個警告信號(1是關於)你應該知道的。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss thisfreelist of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你想看看另一家公司--擁有潛在的更好的財務狀況--那麼不要錯過這一點免費令人感興趣的公司名單,有強勁的財務數據支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature.We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice.It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不是金融建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touchwith us directly.Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯團隊發電子郵件,地址是simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論