What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Avanti Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:AVAN)?
What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Avanti Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:AVAN)?
A look at the shareholders of Avanti Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:AVAN) can tell us which group is most powerful. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.
看一看的股東Avanti收購公司。(紐約證券交易所代碼：AVEN)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。一般來説，隨着公司的成長，機構會增加他們的持股。相反，隨着時間的推移，內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。已經私有化的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股。
With a market capitalization of US$733m, Avanti Acquisition is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Avanti Acquisition.
Avanti收購的市值為7.33億美元，是一隻小盤股，因此可能不為許多機構投資者所熟知。看看我們關於所有權集團的數據(如下所示)，似乎是機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Avanti收購的什麼。
View our latest analysis for Avanti AcquisitionNYSE:AVAN Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2021What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avanti Acquisition?
查看我們對Avanti收購的最新分析紐約證券交易所：Avan所有權細分2021年9月30日關於Avanti收購，機構所有權告訴了我們什麼？
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此，他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Avanti Acquisition. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Avanti Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.NYSE:AVAN Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2021
如你所見，機構投資者在Avanti收購中擁有相當數量的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而，最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣，有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時，它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時，多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司，這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到Avanti收購的歷史收益和收入，但請記住，故事總是有更多的內容。紐約證券交易所：Avanti收益和收入增長2021年9月30日
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 15% of Avanti Acquisition shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is NNS Group, with ownership of 20%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 5.3% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票，董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。看起來對衝基金擁有15%的Avanti收購股份。這很有趣，因為對衝基金可以相當活躍和積極。許多人在尋找將推動股價走高的中期催化劑。該公司最大股東為NNS集團，持股20%。相比之下，第二大和第三大股東分別持有約9.6%和5.3%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查後，我們發現該公司超過一半的股份由前9名股東持有，這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小股東所平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far I can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.Insider Ownership Of Avanti Acquisition
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的，但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。據我所知，沒有分析師對該公司的報道，因此它很可能是在低調行事。Avanti收購的內部人所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同，但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層對董事會負責，董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是，有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
內部人持股是積極的，當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而，高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下，這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Avanti Acquisition Corp. insiders own under 1% of the company. It appears that the board holds about US$1.7m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of US$733m. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.General Public Ownership
我們的信息顯示，Avanti收購公司的內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。董事會似乎持有價值約170萬美元的股票。相比之下，該公司的市值為7.33億美元。許多小公司的投資者更希望看到董事會加大投資。你可以點擊這裏，看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。一般公有制
With a 22% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Avanti Acquisition. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.Next Steps:
擁有22%的股權，普通公眾對Avanti的收購有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀，但如果決策與其他大股東不同步，可能不足以改變公司政策。接下來的步驟：
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted2 warning signs for Avanti Acquisition(of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.
我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力，我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有它們，我們已經發現2個收購Avanti的警告信號(其中1個與我們坐在一起不太好！)你應該知道。
Of coursethis may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see ourfreecollection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。因此，您可能希望看到我們的免費一組有趣的潛在客户，擁有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注：本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的，指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature.We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice.It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫，具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論，我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議，也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意，我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touchwith us directly.Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎？擔心內容嗎？保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者，也可以給編輯組發電子郵件，地址是implywallst.com。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。