Following a 1.6% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE:EAF) Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in GrafTech International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在GrafTech International的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有顯著影響。
- 總共有8位投資者持有公司多數股權,佔53%的所有權。
- 所有權研究與分析師預測數據有助於更好地理解一隻股票的機會。
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
特朗普承諾「釋放」美國石油和天然氣資源,而這15家美國公司的進展有望從中受益。
If you want to know who really controls GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE:EAF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想了解誰真正控制着GrafTech International Ltd.(NYSE:EAF),那麼你必須查看其股東名冊的構成。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔45%,是機構投資者。換句話說,這些機構從投資中可能獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。
Last week's US$72m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 1.6% losses.
上週市值增加的US$7200萬可能會受到機構投資者的歡迎,尤其是經過一年1.6%的虧損之後。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of GrafTech International, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地研究GrafTech International的每種類型的股東,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GrafTech International?
機構所有權告訴我們關於GrafTech International的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時,通常會以某個基準來衡量自身表現,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往對其更加熱衷。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構投資者登記在冊,尤其是當公司處於增長階段時。
We can see that GrafTech International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see GrafTech International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,GrafTech International確實有機構投資者;並且他們持有公司相當一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們看好它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司來說,這種風險更高。你可以看到GrafTech International的歷史盈利和收入如下,但請記住,故事總是有更多的細節。

It looks like hedge funds own 8.2% of GrafTech International shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Colonial House Capital Limited is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 10.0% and 8.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, HEG Limited and Marathon Asset Management, LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
看起來對沖基金擁有GrafTech International 8.2%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍並採取激進策略。許多人尋找中期催化劑來推動股價上漲。我們的數據顯示,Colonial House Capital Limited是最大的股東,持有12%的已發行股份。HEG Limited和Marathon Asset Management, LP分別是第二和第三大股東,分別持有10.0%和8.2%的已發行股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前8大股東佔據了股東名冊的一半以上,少數較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了較大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權能夠爲您的研究增加價值,但了解分析師的建議也是獲取股票預期表現更深入理解的良好實踐。 目前有不少分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對公司未來的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of GrafTech International
GrafTech International 的內部人士持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人士的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員屬於內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,而董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就在董事會中任職。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。然而,有時這會使其他股東更難以追究董事會決策的責任。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in GrafTech International Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$25m worth of the US$432m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會有興趣了解,內部人士持有GrafTech International Ltd.的股份。這些內部人士集體擁有該公司價值US$25m的股份,而公司總價值爲US$432m。這表明至少存在某種程度的利益一致。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買賣股票的行爲。
General Public Ownership
全民所有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in GrafTech International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有GrafTech International 22%的股份。儘管這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私營公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 9.1%, of the GrafTech International stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私人公司擁有GrafTech International 9.1%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時候,內幕人士通過持有私人公司的股份而非以個人身份對上市公司產生影響。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但這一點值得注意,並作爲進一步研究的方向。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司持股情況
We can see that public companies hold 10.0% of the GrafTech International shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有GrafTech International已發行股份的10.0%。這可能是一種戰略投資,兩家公司可能存在相關的業務利益。也有可能是他們進行了分拆。這一持股情況可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for GrafTech International (2 are potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮一家公司的不同股東群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素需要關注。例如,我們發現了GrafTech International的三個警示信號(其中兩個可能較爲嚴重!),您在投資之前應該了解這些信息。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你和我一樣,可能會想知道這家公司是會成長還是萎縮。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費報告,了解分析師對其未來發展的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數據是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出,該期間指截至財務報表日期的最後一天的12個月。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋嗎?擔心內容問題?請直接聯繫我們。或者,發郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St發佈,屬於一般性文章。我們提供的評論僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測,並採用公正的方法,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成購買或出售任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本面數據爲導向的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮到最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St未持有文中提及的任何股票。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。