share_log

What Type Of Shareholders Make Up CHP Merger Corp.'s (NASDAQ:CHPM) Share Registry?

What Type Of Shareholders Make Up CHP Merger Corp.'s (NASDAQ:CHPM) Share Registry?

什麼類型的股東組成 CHP 合併公司 's (納斯達克:CHPM) 股份註冊處?
Simply Wall St. ·  2020/07/05 14:42

20200706001959577d0341x0j7nd32o2

If you want to know who really controls CHP Merger Corp. (NASDAQ:CHPM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了CHP合併公司。(納斯達克:CHPM),那麼你就必須看看它的股票登記處的構成。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。我們還傾向於看到,以前為公眾所有的公司的內部人持股比例較低。

With a market capitalization of US$373m, CHP Merger is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about CHP Merger.

CHP Merge的市值為3.73億美元,是一隻小盤股,因此可能不為許多機構投資者所熟知。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權集團,瞭解更多關於CHP合併的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for CHP Merger

查看我們對衞生與公眾健康保險公司合併的最新分析

20200706002013685d034p2m4tej4ky5

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CHP Merger?

關於熱電聯產的合併,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CHP Merger. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone, since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CHP Merger's historic earnings and revenue, below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在CHP合併中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以看到CHP Merge的歷史收益和收入,如下所示,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

20200706002036384d0346nkw5d9tkkb

It looks like hedge funds own 17% of CHP Merger shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that Concord Health Partners, LLC is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. UBS O'Connor LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 6.5% of common stock, and Glazer Capital, LLC holds about 5.5% of the company stock.

看起來對衝基金擁有CHP併購案17%的股份。這一點值得注意,因為對衝基金往往是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。我們的數據顯示,協和健康夥伴有限責任公司是最大的股東,持有20%的流通股。UBS O‘Connor LLC是第二大股東,持有6.5%的普通股,Glazer Capital,LLC持有約5.5%的公司股票。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔到了股東名冊的一半以上,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far I can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。據我所知,沒有分析師對該公司的報道,因此它很可能是在低調行事。

Insider Ownership Of CHP Merger

熱電聯產合併的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CHP Merger Corp. in their own names. It has a market capitalization of just US$373m, and the board has only US$746k worth of shares in their own names. I generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checkingif those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有CHP合併公司不到1%的股份。它的市值只有3.73億美元,董事會自己名下的股票價值只有7.46億美元。我總體上喜歡看到董事會投入更多。然而,如果這些內部人士一直在買入,可能值得一查。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 29% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over CHPM. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有29%的所有權,普通公眾對CHPM有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 20%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有20%股權的私募股權公司有能力在塑造專注於價值創造的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市後,它們的股票都賣光了。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for CHP Merger you should know about.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現一個CHP合併的警告標誌你應該知道。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然了,如果你把目光投向別處,你可能會發現這是一筆很棒的投資。所以讓我們來看看這個免費有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, emaileditorial-team@simplywallst.com.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,通過電子郵件發送電子郵件至EDITICATION-Team@implywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論