share_log

Is Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) Using Too Much Debt?

福斯(紐交所:FLS)是否在過度使用債務?
Simply Wall St ·  03/23 12:39

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Flowserve Corporation (NYSE:FLS) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過,'波動性遠非與風險同義。' 因此,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到福斯公司(紐交所:FLS)確實在其業務中使用債務。但是股東應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?

AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.

人工智能即將改變醫療保健。這20只股票正在致力於從早期診斷到藥物發現的所有工作。最棒的是 - 它們的市值都在100億美元以下 - 仍然有時間提前入場。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

什麼時候債務變得危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果企業無法償還貸方的債務,那麼它就在貸方的掌控之中。資本主義的一部分是「創造性破壞」的過程,在這個過程中,失敗的企業會被銀行家無情地清算。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,一家公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東的權益,僅僅是爲了穩住其資產負債表。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,而沒有任何負面後果。當我們考慮一家公司使用債務時,我們首先會同時關注現金和債務。

What Is Flowserve's Debt?

福斯公司的債務是什麼?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of December 2024 Flowserve had US$1.48b of debt, an increase on US$1.21b, over one year. On the flip side, it has US$675.4m in cash leading to net debt of about US$808.8m.

您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但截至2024年12月,福斯的債務爲14.8億美元,比12.1億美元增加了一年。另一方面,它有67540萬美元的現金,淨債務約爲80880萬美元。

big
NYSE:FLS Debt to Equity History March 23rd 2025
紐交所:FLS 債務與股本歷史 2025年3月23日

A Look At Flowserve's Liabilities

福斯的負債分析

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Flowserve had liabilities of US$1.47b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.98b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$675.4m in cash and US$1.28b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.50b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,福斯的負債爲14.7億美元,在一年內到期,19.8億美元的負債在其後到期。對此,它有67540萬美元的現金和12.8億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款多出15億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because Flowserve is worth US$6.66b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

這個赤字並不算太糟,因爲福斯的價值爲66.6億美元,因此如果有需要,它可能能夠籌集足夠的資本來填補其資產負債表。然而,仔細審視其償還債務的能力仍然是值得的。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們關於債務水平相對於收益的情況。第一個是淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比例,第二個是息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息費用的倍數(或者簡稱利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們既考慮扣除折舊和攤銷費用後的收益,也考慮包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益來評估債務相對於收益的情況。

With net debt sitting at just 1.4 times EBITDA, Flowserve is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And it boasts interest cover of 8.0 times, which is more than adequate. Another good sign is that Flowserve has been able to increase its EBIT by 28% in twelve months, making it easier to pay down debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Flowserve can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

流動負債僅爲EBITDA的1.4倍,福斯的財務槓桿無疑相對保守。它的利息覆蓋率爲8.0倍,完全足夠。另一個好兆頭是,福斯在過去十二個月中EBIT增長了28%,使其更容易償還債務。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到了大部分債務知識。但歸根結底,公司的未來盈利能力將決定福斯能否隨着時間的推移增強其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師的利潤預測。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Flowserve's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

但我們的最後一個考慮也是重要的,因爲公司不能用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要真金白銀。所以值得檢查一下這些EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年中,福斯的自由現金流佔其EBIT的43%,低於我們的預期。這種微弱的現金轉換使得應對債務更加困難。

Our View

Our View

The good news is that Flowserve's demonstrated ability to grow its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And its interest cover is good too. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that Flowserve can handle its debt fairly comfortably. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that Flowserve insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.

好消息是,福斯展現了其EBIT增長的能力,讓我們感到愉悅,就像毛茸茸的小狗逗弄幼兒一樣。它的利息覆蓋率也很好。綜合考慮以上所有因素,我們認爲福斯能夠相對輕鬆地處理其債務。積極的一面是,這種槓桿可以提高股東回報,但潛在的缺點是增加損失風險,因此值得監控資產負債表。如果我們發現福斯內部人員最近購買了股票,我們將激勵自己進一步研究該股票。如果你也想這樣做,那麼你真幸運,因爲今天我們將免費分享報告的內部交易列表。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資那些可以在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,那麼請查看這份擁有淨現金的增長業務的免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 389

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。