share_log

We Think Pan-United's (SGX:P52) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve

We Think Pan-United's (SGX:P52) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve

我們認爲泛聯(新加坡交易所:P52)的利潤僅是他們可以實現的基準。
Simply Wall St ·  03/05 06:13

Even though Pan-United Corporation Ltd's (SGX:P52) recent earnings release was robust, the market didn't seem to notice. Our analysis suggests that investors might be missing some promising details.

儘管潘聯合公司(新加坡交易所:P52)最近的業績表現強勁,但市場似乎並沒有注意到。我們的分析表明,投資者可能忽視了一些有前途的細節。

big
SGX:P52 Earnings and Revenue History March 4th 2025
新加坡交易所:P52 收益和營業收入歷史 2025年3月4日

A Closer Look At Pan-United's Earnings

仔細看看潘聯合的收益

Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

許多投資者可能沒有聽說過現金流中的應計比率,但這實際上是一個有用的衡量標準,用於評估公司在特定時期內的利潤有多大程度上由自由現金流(FCF)支持。簡單來說,這個比率是將FCF從凈利潤中減去,然後將這個數字除以公司在該時期內的平均經營資產。該比率向我們展示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,負的應計比率對公司來說是積極的,而正的應計比率則是消極的。雖然擁有正的應計比率並不是問題,這表明一定程度的非現金利潤,但高的應計比率可以說是一個壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤並未與現金流匹配。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年的一篇論文,"擁有較高應計的公司往往未來的盈利能力較差"。

For the year to December 2024, Pan-United had an accrual ratio of -0.15. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of S$69m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of S$40.9m. Pan-United shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months.

截至2024年12月的年度內,潘聯合的應計比率爲-0.15。因此,其法定收益遠低於其自由現金流。具體來說,在此期間,它產生了6900萬新元的自由現金流,遠遠超過其報告的4090萬新元的凈利潤。潘聯合的股東無疑會對過去十二個月自由現金流的改善感到滿意。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以點擊這裏查看基於他們的估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

Our Take On Pan-United's Profit Performance

我們對泛聯利潤表現的看法

As we discussed above, Pan-United has perfectly satisfactory free cash flow relative to profit. Based on this observation, we consider it likely that Pan-United's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And on top of that, its earnings per share have grown at an extremely impressive rate over the last three years. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. If you'd like to know more about Pan-United as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Pan-United you should be aware of.

正如我們之前討論的,泛聯相對於利潤有着完全令人滿意的自由現金流。基於這一觀察,我們認爲泛聯的法定利潤實際上低估了其盈利潛力!更重要的是,在過去三年中,其每股收益以極其令人印象深刻的速度增長。當然,在分析其盈利方面我們才剛剛觸及表面;我們還可以考慮利潤率、預測增長和投資回報等其他因素。如果你想更多地了解泛聯作爲一家業務的重要性,了解其面臨的風險是很重要的。舉個例子:我們發現了一個泛聯應該關注的警告信號。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Pan-United's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

這則說明只關注了一個因素,揭示了泛聯利潤的本質。但還有很多其他方式可以幫助你形成對公司的看法。有些人認爲高股本回報率是優質業務的良好標誌。因此,你可能希望查看這份高股本回報率公司的免費集合,或這份內部持股較高的股票名單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論