share_log

Institutions Profited After Plug Power Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PLUG) Market Cap Rose US$219m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most

Institutions Profited After Plug Power Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PLUG) Market Cap Rose US$219m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most

在Plug Power Inc.(納斯達克:PLUG)的市值上週增長了21900萬美元后,機構獲利,但散戶投資者的利潤最大。
Simply Wall St ·  01/11 13:52

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Plug Power's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
  • Institutions own 40% of Plug Power
  • 普拉格能源的重大零售投資者持有表明關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
  • 前25大股東持有公司46%的股份
  • 機構持有普拉格能源40%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ:PLUG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 46% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制普拉格能源公司(納斯達克:PLUG),那麼你必須查看其股份登記的組成。零售投資者持有46%的股份,是公司中股份最多的。這意味着,如果股票上漲,零售投資者將受益最多(或者如果股市下跌,他們將損失最多)。

Following a 9.1% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 40% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

在上週股票價格上漲9.1%後,散戶投資者獲利最多,但持有40%股票的機構也從中受益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Plug Power, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解普拉格能源每種類型的股東,首先看看下面的圖表。

big
NasdaqCM:PLUG Ownership Breakdown January 11th 2025
納斯達克CM:PLUG 股東結構 2025年1月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Plug Power?

機構持股告訴我們關於普拉格能源什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Plug Power already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Plug Power's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

普拉格能源的股東名冊上已經有機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。 這可以表明該公司在投資界有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的假定驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票改變看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看普拉格能源的盈利歷史。 當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:PLUG Earnings and Revenue Growth January 11th 2025
納斯達克CM:普拉格能源2025年1月11日的收益和營業收入增長

Plug Power is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.1% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

普拉格能源並不被對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有9.1%的流通股份。作爲參考,第二大股東持有約8.3%的流通股份,第三大股東則持有7.6%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Plug Power

普拉格能源的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Plug Power Inc.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$18m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人持有的普拉格能源股份少於1%。但他們可能通過一種我們尚未注意到的公司結構間接擁有股份。 這是一個大公司,因此即便是小比例的持股也可以在董事會和股東之間創造一致性。在這種情況下,內部人持有價值1800萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股票是好事,但查一下這些內部人是否在買入也許是值得的。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 46% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司46%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能做主,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.0%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司6.0%的股份。私人公司可能與相關方有關。有時,內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而非作爲個人身份在一家上市公司中擁有利益。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Plug Power has 3 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

我發現研究誰具體擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——普拉格能源有3個警告信號(還有1個不容忽視)我們認爲你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 568

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。