With 59% Ownership of the Shares, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:SYBT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 59% Ownership of the Shares, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:SYBT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Stock Yards Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 顯著較高的機構持股意味着Stock Yards Bancorp的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前25大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
Every investor in Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:SYBT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.(納斯達克:SYBT)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體大約佔59%,也就是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(如果出現下跌,他們將損失最多)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構可以獲取大量資本,因此他們的市場動作往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,大量機構投資於一家公司的資金通常被視爲積極的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Stock Yards Bancorp.
在下圖中,我們將聚焦於Stock Yards Bancorp的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stock Yards Bancorp?
機構投資持股對Stock Yards Bancorp的含義是什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stock Yards Bancorp. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Stock Yards Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Stock Yards Bancorp中持有相當多的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師對這隻股票進行了評估,他們對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於 "擁擠交易 "的風險。當這種交易出現錯誤時,多個方可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Stock Yards Bancorp的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是更復雜。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stock Yards Bancorp. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半發行的股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 我們注意到對Stock Yards Bancorp的對沖基金投資並不顯著。 我們的數據表明,貝萊德是最大的股東,持有6.9%的流通股份。 作爲對比,第二大股東持有大約6.3%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股爲4.2%。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Stock Yards Bancorp
Stock Yards Bancorp的內部股東持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$49m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有一部分Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.的股票。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約4900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士進行這樣的投資是好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 38% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Stock Yards Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
大衆持有38%的股份,主要是散戶投資者,對Stock Yards Bancorp具有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能決定一切,但確實能夠對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Stock Yards Bancorp .
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的關於Stock Yards Bancorp的一個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。