share_log

With 78% Ownership of the Shares, Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ:HON) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 78% Ownership of the Shares, Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ:HON) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

霍尼韋爾國際公司(納斯達克:HON)擁有78%的股份,受到機構投資者的強烈控制。
Simply Wall St ·  01/08 21:52

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Honeywell International's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構在股票中擁有的大額股份,霍尼韋爾國際的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前25個股東持有48%的業務。
  • 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景

A look at the shareholders of Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ:HON) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看霍尼韋爾國際公司(納斯達克:HON)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。機構持有78%的股份,擁有公司最多的股份。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中獲得的收益(或損失)最大。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構擁有巨額資本,他們的市場動作往往受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,投資於公司的機構資金通常被視爲對其未來的巨大信心投票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Honeywell International.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於霍尼韋爾國際的情況。

big
NasdaqGS:HON Ownership Breakdown January 8th 2025
納斯達克:HON 股東結構 2025年1月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Honeywell International?

機構持股能告訴我們關於霍尼韋爾國際的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that Honeywell International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Honeywell International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,霍尼韋爾國際確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這暗示着那些機構的分析師已經研究了這隻股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,出現大幅股價下跌的情況並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下霍尼韋爾國際過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:HON Earnings and Revenue Growth January 8th 2025
納斯達克證券交易所:霍尼韋爾 2025年1月8日的盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Honeywell International. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對霍尼韋爾國際的對沖基金並沒有顯著投資。我們的數據顯示,先鋒集團(The Vanguard Group, Inc.)是最大股東,持有9.4%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約6.4%的流通股,第三大股東則持有4.8%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

通過研究我們的持股數據,我們發現前25大股東共同持有的股份少於50%,這意味着沒有任何個人擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Honeywell International

霍尼韋爾國際的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Honeywell International Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$124m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,霍尼韋爾國際公司內部人士持有不到1%的公司股份。由於它是一家大型公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值12400萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,觀察這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有21%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Honeywell International better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Honeywell International is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

始終值得考慮擁有一家公司股票的不同群體。但要更好地理解霍尼韋爾國際,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 請注意,霍尼韋爾國際在我們的投資分析中出現了1個警告信號,你應該知道...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論