With 63% Ownership in Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 63% Ownership in Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Expand Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 由於機構在股票中的大量持股,Expand Energy的股票價格可能會受到他們交易決定的影響。
- 前18大股東擁有公司的50%。
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
If you want to know who really controls Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了Expand Energy Corporation(納斯達克:EXE),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的構成。機構以63%的持股比例,擁有該公司最多的股份。換句話說,機構面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$723m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 35% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
在公司上週市值增長72300萬美元后,機構投資者的前景看起來不錯。當前一年的投資回報率爲35%,上週的增長將會受到熱烈歡迎。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Expand Energy.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於Expand Energy的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Expand Energy?
機構持股告訴我們關於Expand Energy什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Expand Energy. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Expand Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所見,機構投資者在Expand Energy中擁有相當的股份。這顯示出專業投資者之間的一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會進行糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看Expand Energy的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Expand Energy. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Blackstone Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 5.5%.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 我們注意到對Expand Energy的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。 普信集團目前是該公司最大的股東,擁有11%的流通股份。 第二大和第三大股東分別是先鋒集團和黑石集團,持有相同數量的股份,各爲5.5%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前18名股東在公司擁有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司有顯著控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Expand Energy
Expand Energy的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Expand Energy Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$49m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,Expand Energy Corporation的內部人士擁有不到1%的公司股份。但他們可能通過我們尚未發覺的企業結構間接持有利益。由於公司規模龐大,我們不期望內部人士擁有大比例的股票。他們共同持有價值4900萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,觀察這些內部人士的買入或賣出動作可能更有趣。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Expand Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Expand Energy 28%的股份。雖然這種股份規模可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 5.5% stake in Expand Energy. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
股權投資公司持有Expand Energy 5.5%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有些人可能對此感到滿意,因爲股權投資有時是積極的,能夠讓管理層負責。但有時,股權投資則是在公司上市後選擇撤出。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Expand Energy (2 don't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of.
我發現研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經識別出Expand Energy的5個警告信號(有2個讓我們感到不太舒服),你應該注意這些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。