share_log

Institutional Investors Are Clearfield, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLFD) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$54m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Clearfield, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLFD) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$54m Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是克利爾菲爾德通訊(納斯達克:CLFD)最大的投資者,他們在上週市值增長5400萬美元后獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  01/08 00:23

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Clearfield's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有的大量股份,克利爾菲爾德通訊的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前12大股東持有公司51%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Clearfield, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLFD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正掌控了克利爾菲爾德公司(納斯達克:CLFD),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有最大份額的集團是擁有63%股份的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$54m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 23%.

在公司上週市值增加5400萬美元后,機構投資者的前景看好。上週的增幅進一步提升了股東的年回報,目前已達到23%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Clearfield.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於克利爾菲爾德通訊的信息。

big
NasdaqGM:CLFD Ownership Breakdown January 7th 2025
納斯達克GM:CLFD 所有權分佈 2025年1月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Clearfield?

機構所有權告訴我們關於克利爾菲爾德通訊什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Clearfield already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Clearfield, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

克利爾菲爾德通訊已經有機構在其股票註冊上。確實,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,和其他任何人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某隻股票,股票價格大跌並不罕見。所以查看克利爾菲爾德通訊過去的營業收入軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGM:CLFD Earnings and Revenue Growth January 7th 2025
納斯達克GM:CLFD 2025年1月7日的營業收入和增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Clearfield. The company's largest shareholder is Ronald Roth, with ownership of 10%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.3% and 6.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Cheryl Beranek directly holds 3.3% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。對克利爾菲爾德的對沖基金持有的股份不多。公司的最大股東是羅納德·羅斯,擁有10%的股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有7.3%和6.7%的流通股。此外,公司的CEO謝麗爾·貝拉內克直接持有3.3%的總流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東註冊,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Clearfield

克利爾菲爾德的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Clearfield, Inc.. Insiders own US$80m worth of shares in the US$475m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士在克利爾菲爾德公司持有大量股份。內部人士擁有價值8000萬美元的股票,公司的市值爲47500萬美元。我們認爲這表明與股東之間的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相對較小;一些內部人士可能是該業務的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Clearfield. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆以20%的持股比例對克利爾菲爾德公司有一定的影響力,主要由個人投資者組成。儘管這種持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Clearfield better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解克利爾菲爾德通訊,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營業收入和收益的免費圖表來查看。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論