Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 86%
Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 86%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Gilead Sciences implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在吉利德科學的重大持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有顯著影響。
- 共有13位投資者在公司中持有51%的多數股份。
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了吉利德科學公司(納斯達克:GILD),重要的是要理解該業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有大部分股份,持股比例爲86%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最多(或者如果出現下跌,損失也將是最大的)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Gilead Sciences.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於吉利德科學的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gilead Sciences?
機構持股情況揭示了哪些關於吉利德科學的信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Gilead Sciences. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Gilead Sciences, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在吉利德科學中持有相當比例的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看過這隻股票,並且對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們可能會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,看到大幅股價下跌並不罕見。因此,查看吉利德科學的過去盈利走勢是值得的(見下文)。當然,請記住,還需要考慮其他因素。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Gilead Sciences. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company, with ownership of 11%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對吉利德科學的對沖基金沒有進行實質性投資。該公司的最大股東是資本研究與管理公司,持股11%。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約9.8%的流通股份,第三大股東持有9.3%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前13大股東在公司中的合計持股比例爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Gilead Sciences
吉利德科學的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that Gilead Sciences, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$93m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,吉利德科學公司的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士持有其少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值9300萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股票是好的,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Gilead Sciences. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,在吉利德科學公司持有14%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能夠做主,但確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Gilead Sciences you should know about.
我發現查看公司確切的擁有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 比如考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了 吉利德科學 的 5 個警告信號,你應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。