share_log

Institutional Investors Are Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MNMD) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$73m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MNMD) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$73m Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是心藥科技公司 (納斯達克:MNMD) 的最大投資者,並在上週市值增加7300萬美元后獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  01/07 20:05

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Mind Medicine (MindMed)'s stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 9 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 由於機構在該股票上持有大量股份,Mind Medicine (MindMed) 的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前9大股東持有公司52%的股份。
  • 近期內部人士的購買。

If you want to know who really controls Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. (NASDAQ:MNMD), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. (納斯達克:MNMD),那麼你需要查看其股份登記的組成情況。我們可以看到,機構在公司中佔據了42%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該團體將獲得最多的收益(或者在市場下跌時失去最多的收益)。

Last week's 15% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 75%.

上週15%的漲幅意味着機構投資者在正面表現上,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。上週的增益將進一步提升目前股東的年回報率,目前爲75%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Mind Medicine (MindMed).

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Mind Medicine(MindMed)的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqGS:MNMD Ownership Breakdown January 7th 2025
納斯達克GS:MNMD 所有權結構 2025年1月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mind Medicine (MindMed)?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Mind Medicine(MindMed)什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

Mind Medicine (MindMed) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Mind Medicine (MindMed), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Mind Medicine(MindMed)已經在股票登記中有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依靠機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看Mind Medicine(MindMed)過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:MNMD Earnings and Revenue Growth January 7th 2025
納斯達克GS:MNMD 2025年1月7日的盈利和營業收入增長

It would appear that 16% of Mind Medicine (MindMed) shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Commodore Capital LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

看起來16%的Mind Medicine(MindMed)股票由對沖基金控制。值得注意的是,對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。 Commodore Capital LP目前是最大的股東,擁有11%的流通股。 爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約9.6%的流通股,其次是第三大股東持有7.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步調查發現,前9大股東大約佔註冊股份的52%,這意味着除了大股東外,還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Mind Medicine (MindMed)

Mind Medicine(MindMed)的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$5.6m worth of the US$527m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東們可能會對內部人士在心智醫學(MindMed)公司持有股票感興趣。內部人士總共持有價值560萬美元的股份,而該公司市值爲52700萬美元。看到內部人士進行一些投資是好的,但可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在繼續購入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Mind Medicine (MindMed). This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是個人投資者的公衆持有心智醫學(MindMed)31%的股份。雖然這一持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 9.6%, private equity firms could influence the Mind Medicine (MindMed) board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

持有9.6%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響Mind Medicine(MindMed)的董事會。有些投資者可能會因而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠推動幫助市場認清公司的價值的戰略。另一方面,那些持有者可能是在公司上市後選擇退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Mind Medicine (MindMed) (at least 2 which are potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,投資風險的無處不在的陰影。我們已識別出Mind Medicine(MindMed)存在的4個警告信號(至少有2個可能是嚴重的),理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論