Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company
Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Starbucks' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 顯著高的機構持股意味着星巴克的股價對他們的交易行爲很敏感
- 共有25位投資者在公司中擁有大部分股份,持股比例達到50%。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 78% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看星巴克-T(納斯達克:SBUX)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個集團最有權力。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有78%的股份。換句話說,這個集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或者失去最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到他們掌握的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有重要影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,投資於公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Starbucks, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討一下星巴克的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Starbucks?
機構持有量告訴我們星巴克的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Starbucks. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Starbucks' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在星巴克擁有相當多的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界有一定的信譽。然而,最好小心不要過於依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構共同持有一隻股票時,始終存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到星巴克的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住,總是有更多的故事。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Starbucks. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.7%. With 6.8% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在星巴克的股份不多。公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,持股9.7%。貝萊德和資本研究與管理公司分別以6.8%和5.2%的流通股份,成爲第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細查看我們的股權數據表明,前25大股東的合計持股比例爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Starbucks
星巴克內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Starbucks Corporation. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$2.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人擁有一些星巴克-T的股份。它是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員 collectively 擁有 21億美元的股份(按照當前價格)。看到這種投資水平很不錯。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人是否最近有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Starbucks. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆擁有 19% 的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們對星巴克有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體不一定能決定一切,但毫無疑問,他們對公司的運營有真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Starbucks better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Starbucks (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但爲了更好地理解星巴克,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,投資風險的時時存在的陰影。 我們已經發現了星巴克的兩個警示信號(至少有一個讓我們感到不安),理解這些信號應該是你投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。