share_log

With 90% Institutional Ownership, Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 90% Institutional Ownership, Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

在90%的機構持股下,Ecolab Inc.(紐交所:ECL)成爲大腕們的熱門選擇
Simply Wall St ·  01/05 22:46

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ecolab's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 顯著高的機構持有率意味着藝康集團的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 營業收入的50%由前21大股東持有。
  • 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 90% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要想了解誰真正控制了藝康集團(紐交所:ECL),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的群體是持有90%股份的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大化的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ecolab, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地探討藝康集團的每種所有者類型,首先看一下下面的圖表。

big
NYSE:ECL Ownership Breakdown January 5th 2025
紐交所:ECL 所有權分佈 2025年1月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ecolab?

機構所有權告訴我們關於藝康集團什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that Ecolab does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ecolab's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到藝康集團確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司大量的股票。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間對一隻股票的看法發生變化,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注藝康集團的盈利歷史。 當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:ECL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 5th 2025
紐交所:ECL 2025年1月5日的營業收入和增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ecolab. Cascade Investment, L.L.C. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.9% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以共同施加顯著的影響力。我們注意到對藝康集團的對沖基金沒有實質性投資。Cascade Investment, L.L.C.目前是最大的股東,擁有10%的流通股。 Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有8.5%的普通股,而貝萊德持有約7.9%的公司股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權數據的深入分析表明,前21大股東的總持股達到50%,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ecolab

藝康集團的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Ecolab Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$65m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以其自身名義擁有藝康集團不足1%。由於藝康集團規模較大,我們不期望內部人士擁有大量股票。總的來說,他們持有6500萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部人士的持股總是好的,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有賣出股票的行爲。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有10%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Ecolab , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看究竟是誰擁有一家公司的信息非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,永遠存在的投資風險的陰影。 我們已經識別出藝康集團的1個警示信號,理解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論