Is LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) A Risky Investment?
Is LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) A Risky Investment?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies LGI Homes, Inc. (NASDAQ:LGIH) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
一些人說,波動性而不是債務是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過「波動性遠非與風險同義。」 當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡查看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過重可能導致毀滅。與許多其他公司一樣,LGI Homes, Inc. (納斯達克:LGIH) 也使用了債務。但這種債務會對股東構成擔憂嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還時才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資金還是依靠自身的現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果一家公司無法支付其債權人,它可能會破產。雖然這並不常見,但我們常常看到負債公司因爲貸方迫使它們以低價融資,從而永久稀釋股東的權益。當然,債務在企業中可以是一種重要工具,尤其是在資金密集型企業中。當我們審視債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。
How Much Debt Does LGI Homes Carry?
LGI Homes負債到底有多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 LGI Homes had US$1.55b of debt, an increase on US$1.19b, over one year. However, it also had US$60.9m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.49b.
您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但它顯示截至2024年9月,LGI Homes的債務爲15.5億美元,比去年增加了11.9億美元。然而,它也有6090萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲14.9億美元。
How Strong Is LGI Homes' Balance Sheet?
LGI Homes的資產負債表有多強?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that LGI Homes had liabilities of US$133.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.70b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$60.9m as well as receivables valued at US$49.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.72b.
仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到LGI Homes在12個月內的負債爲13350萬美元,超過12個月的負債爲17億美元。爲了抵消這些負債,它擁有6090萬美元的現金,以及價值4900萬美元的應收賬款,這些賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額超出了現金和(短期)應收賬款之和的17.2億美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$2.10b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on LGI Homes' use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
考慮到其21億美元的市值,這一赤字是相當可觀的,因此它確實表明股東應該關注LGI Homes的債務使用。這表明如果公司需要迅速改善資產負債表,股東將面臨嚴重稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們使用兩個主要比率來了解相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是它的息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出的次數(或者簡稱爲利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Strangely LGI Homes has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 6.4, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 1k. So either it has access to very cheap long term debt or that interest expense is going to grow! LGI Homes grew its EBIT by 4.2% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if LGI Homes can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
奇怪的是,LGI Homes的EBITDA比率高達6.4,暗示着高債務,但利息覆蓋率只有0.1萬。因此,它要麼獲得了非常便宜的長期債務,要麼利息支出將會增加!LGI Homes在過去一年中EBIT增長了4.2%。雖然這遠不算Incredible,但在償還債務方面是好事。我們無疑從資產負債表上學到最多的債務知識。但最終,公司的未來盈利能力將決定LGI Homes是否能夠隨着時間的推移來強化其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,其中顯示了分析師的盈利預測。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, LGI Homes burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,一家公司只能用冷硬的現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務。因此,邏輯上的一步是查看EBIT中與實際自由現金流匹配的比例。在過去三年中,LGI Homes消耗了大量現金。雖然這可能是增長支出的結果,但這確實使得債務風險大大增加。
Our View
我們的觀點
On the face of it, LGI Homes's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Overall, we think it's fair to say that LGI Homes has enough debt that there are some real risks around the balance sheet. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for LGI Homes that you should be aware of before investing here.
表面上看,LGI Homes的淨債務與EBITDA的比率讓我們對這隻股票感到猶豫,而其EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的比例不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。 但從積極的方面來看,其利息覆蓋率是一個好跡象,使我們更加樂觀。 總體來說,我們認爲可以公平地說,LGI Homes的債務足夠多,財務報表周圍存在一些真實風險。如果一切順利,這應該會提高回報,但另一方面,債務增加了永久性資本損失的風險。毫無疑問,我們從財務報表中對債務的了解最多。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於財務報表中——遠非如此。例如,我們發現了一個LGI Homes的警告信號,在您在此投資之前務必了解。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
無論最終結果如何,有時候更容易關注那些根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費獲取一份淨債務爲零的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。