share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook First Bancorp's (NASDAQ:FBNC) Recent US$90m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook First Bancorp's (NASDAQ:FBNC) Recent US$90m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽視第一萬通金控(納斯達克:FBNC)最近9000萬美元的市值下跌,因爲長期收益仍然積極。
Simply Wall St ·  01/03 20:03

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著高的機構持有比例意味着第一萬通金控的股票價格對其交易行爲敏感
  • 51%的業務由前14名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of First Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBNC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看第一萬通金控(納斯達克:FBNC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最具影響力。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有67%的股份。換句話說,該團體從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或承受最大的損失)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$90m last week. Still, the 22% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

機構投資者在上週公司市值下降9000萬美元后遭受了最高損失。儘管如此,22%的年收益可能幫助緩解了他們的整體損失。然而,我們假設他們會在未來留意任何弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of First Bancorp.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了第一萬通金控的不同持股群體。

big
NasdaqGS:FBNC Ownership Breakdown January 3rd 2025
納斯達克上市公司:FBNC 持股分佈 2025年1月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Bancorp?

機構持股告訴我們關於第一萬通金控什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

We can see that First Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at First Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到第一萬通金控確實有機構投資者,他們持有相當一部分公司的股票。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票改變看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看第一萬通金控的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:FBNC Earnings and Revenue Growth January 3rd 2025
納斯達克GS:FBNC 2025年1月3日的營業收入和收益增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in First Bancorp. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. With 6.8% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此他們可以集體發揮重要的權力。我們注意到對第一萬通金控的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。公司最大的股東是貝萊德,擁有15%的股份。先鋒集團和維度基金顧問分別擁有6.8%和5.4%的流通股,因此是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前14名股東在公司中的合計持股爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司具有顯著控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解方向也是有意義的。該股票的分析師覆蓋面較小,但並不多,因此還有空間獲得更多的覆蓋。

Insider Ownership Of First Bancorp

第一萬通金控的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in First Bancorp. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$64m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有第一萬通金控的一些股票。這些內部人士的股份價值達6400萬美元。大多數人認爲這非常積極。大多數人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。不過,值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有30%的股份,因此無法輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand First Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - First Bancorp has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解第一萬通金控,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 以風險爲例 - 第一萬通金控有一個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論