The Returns On Capital At Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) Don't Inspire Confidence
The Returns On Capital At Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) Don't Inspire Confidence
What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. This indicates the company is producing less profit from its investments and its total assets are decreasing. On that note, looking into Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK), we weren't too upbeat about how things were going.
什麼潛在的基本趨勢可以表明一家公司可能正在衰退?一個可能處於衰退中的企業通常顯示出兩個趨勢:資本回報率(ROCE)正在下降,以及使用的資本基礎也在下降。這表明公司從其投資中獲得的利潤減少,並且其總資產在減少。關於這一點,看看美國史丹利公司(紐交所:SWK),我們對事情的發展並不樂觀。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
什麼是資本回報率(ROCE)?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Stanley Black & Decker, this is the formula:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量的是一家公司能夠從其業務中投入的資本生成的稅前利潤金額。要計算美國史丹利公司的這個指標,公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.065 = US$1.1b ÷ (US$22b - US$5.3b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.065 = 11億美元 ÷ (220億美元 - 53億美元)(基於截至2024年9月的過去12個月)。
Therefore, Stanley Black & Decker has an ROCE of 6.5%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Machinery industry average of 12%.
因此,美國史丹利公司的ROCE爲6.5%。在絕對值上,這是一個低迴報,並且也低於機械行業的平均水平12%。
In the above chart we have measured Stanley Black & Decker's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Stanley Black & Decker for free.
在上面的圖表中,我們測量了美國史丹利公司的歷史投資回報率 (ROCE) 及其以往表現,但未來可能更爲重要。如果您願意,可以查看涵蓋美國史丹利公司的分析師的預測,完全免費。
So How Is Stanley Black & Decker's ROCE Trending?
那麼,美國史丹利公司的ROCE趨勢如何?
There is reason to be cautious about Stanley Black & Decker, given the returns are trending downwards. To be more specific, the ROCE was 11% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Stanley Black & Decker becoming one if things continue as they have.
鑑於回報率呈下降趨勢,我們對美國史丹利公司保持謹慎態度。更具體地說,五年前的ROCE爲11%,但自那時以來明顯下降。在使用的資本方面,該業務大致使用與當時相同的資本。由於回報率下降,而該業務使用的資產保持不變,這可能表明這是一個在過去五年中沒有太多增長的成熟業務。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於成爲多倍回報的公司,如果事情繼續保持現狀,我們不抱太大期待美國史丹利公司能成爲那樣的公司。
In Conclusion...
結論...
In summary, it's unfortunate that Stanley Black & Decker is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 44% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
總之,令人遺憾的是,美國史丹利公司從相同的資本中產生的回報率下降。因此,該股票在過去五年中下跌了44%似乎並不令人意外,因此投資者似乎正在意識到這些變化。除非在這些指標上出現更積極的變化,否則我們會考慮其他選擇。
If you'd like to know more about Stanley Black & Decker, we've spotted 2 warning signs, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.
如果您想了解更多關於美國史丹利公司的信息,我們發現了2個警告信號,其中1個讓我們感到有些不安。
While Stanley Black & Decker isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
雖然美國史丹利公司並沒有獲得最高的回報,但請查看這份免費名單,列出了那些在股本上實現高回報且資產負債表良好的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。