With 85% Ownership, TE Connectivity Plc (NYSE:TEL) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 85% Ownership, TE Connectivity Plc (NYSE:TEL) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in TE Connectivity implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在泰科電子的 substantial 持股意味着他們對公司的股價擁有顯著影響。
- 51%的業務由前18位股東持有。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
Every investor in TE Connectivity plc (NYSE:TEL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位泰科電子 plc(紐交所:TEL)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有85%的股份。換句話說,該群體在對公司的投資中將獲得最大的收益(或面臨最大的損失)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構能夠接觸到大量資金,他們的市場動作往往受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,公司中擁有大量機構資金的投資通常被視爲一種可取的特質。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TE Connectivity.
在下面的圖表中,我們專注於泰科電子的不同持有群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TE Connectivity?
機構持有情況告訴我們關於泰科電子什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
TE Connectivity already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of TE Connectivity, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
泰科電子的股東登記上已經有很多機構。實際上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好小心依賴於來自機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出現錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下泰科電子過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. TE Connectivity is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.3% of common stock, and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. holds about 7.3% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們能夠共同發揮重大影響力。泰科電子並不被對沖基金擁有。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,持有9.5%的流通股。貝萊德是第二大股東,擁有8.3%的普通股,而普信集團持有大約7.3%的公司股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細查看我們的所有權數據,前18位股東的總持股比例爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of TE Connectivity
泰科電子的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of TE Connectivity plc in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$54m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己名義擁有泰科電子公司的股份不到1%。由於公司規模如此龐大,我們不期望內部人士擁有較大比例的股票。他們合計持有價值5400萬美元的股票。看到內部人士至少有一些股份總是好的,但也許值得查看這些內部人士是否在出售股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有公司15%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然這一群體未必能決定一切,但它們無疑可以對公司的運行產生真實的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with TE Connectivity .
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的泰科電子的一個警示信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。