share_log

With 58% Ownership, Garmin Ltd. (NYSE:GRMN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 58% Ownership, Garmin Ltd. (NYSE:GRMN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Garmin Ltd.(紐交所:GRMN)擁有58%的股份,擁有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/26 18:42

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Garmin implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在佳明的重大持股表明他們對公司股價有重要影響。
  • 前11大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

A look at the shareholders of Garmin Ltd. (NYSE:GRMN) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看佳明有限公司(紐交所:GRMN)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構在該公司的持股比例高達58%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大利益(或在市場下跌時損失最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構擁有巨額資本,他們的市場動作往往受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,投資於公司的機構資金通常被視爲對其未來的巨大信心投票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Garmin.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於佳明的什麼。

big
NYSE:GRMN Ownership Breakdown December 26th 2024
紐交所:GRMN 股權分佈 2024年12月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Garmin?

機構擁有權告訴我們關於Garmin的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Garmin already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Garmin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

佳明已經有機構在股票註冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一些可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在風險,他們可能涉及到 "擁擠交易"。當這種交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會爭相快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到佳明的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是比這更復雜。

big
NYSE:GRMN Earnings and Revenue Growth December 26th 2024
紐交所:佳明 2024年12月26日的營業收入和增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Garmin is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Min-Hwan Kao (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 9.5% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. The second and third largest shareholders are The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Jonathan Burrell, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.3%. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Jonathan Burrell is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。佳明並不被對沖基金擁有。從我們的數據中,我們推測最大股東是Min-Hwan Kao(他還擔任重要首席執行官職務),持有9.5%的流通股份。公司內部人士擁有大量股份通常被視爲一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。第二和第三大股東分別是先鋒集團和Jonathan Burrell,他們的股份數量相同,均爲9.3%。有趣的是,第三大股東Jonathan Burrell也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司主要股東中存在強大的內部持股。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前11名股東在公司中擁有的股份總和達到50%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司有顯著控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Garmin

Garmin的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Garmin Ltd.. Insiders own US$7.7b worth of shares in the US$41b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看來內部人士持有佳明有限公司相當大比例的股份。內部人士持有價值77億美元的股票,而公司市值爲410億美元。這是相當有意義的。看到這種投資水平很好。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有購入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Garmin. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

大衆公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有佳明23%的股份。雖然這種擁有規模可能不足以影響他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Garmin better, we need to consider many other factors.

始終值得考慮不同群體在公司中持有的股份。但要更好地理解佳明,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營業收入和收益的免費圖表來查看。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論