On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 59%
On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 59%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies On Holding's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 19% of On Holding is held by insiders
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着On Holding的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前18大股東擁有公司的50%。
- 19%的On Holding股份由內部人士持有。
If you want to know who really controls On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着On Holding AG(紐交所:ONON),你需要查看其股票註冊的組成情況。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有絕大部分股份,持股比例爲59%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構能夠接觸到大量資金,他們的市場動作往往受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,公司中擁有大量機構資金的投資通常被視爲一種可取的特質。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about On Holding.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於On Holding的事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About On Holding?
機構持股對我們了解On Holding有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that On Holding does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at On Holding's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到On Holding確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注這支股票並對其持積極態度。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,股價可能迅速下跌。因此,值得查看以下On Holding的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. On Holding is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is FMR LLC with 8.9% of shares outstanding. With 5.6% and 5.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Marc Lemann and AllianceBernstein L.P. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Martin Hoffmann is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以強有力地影響董事會的決策。On Holding並不被對沖基金持有。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到最大股東是FMR LLC,持有8.9%的流通股。Marc Lemann和AllianceBernstein L.P.分別爲第二和第三大股東,持有5.6%和5.3%的流通股。此外,CEO馬丁·霍夫曼擁有公司0.6%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細查看我們的所有權數據,前18大股東的合併持股比例達到了50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有絕對多數。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of On Holding
On Holding的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of On Holding AG. It has a market capitalization of just US$18b, and insiders have US$3.4b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人士擁有On Holding AG相當大比例的股份。它的市值僅爲180億美元,而內部人士名下的股票價值爲34億美元。這相當可觀。大多數人會說,這顯示出與股東之間的高度一致性,特別是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,在公司中擁有19%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。儘管這樣的持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 3.5%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司3.5%的股份。可能值得進一步調查。如果相關方,如內部人員,對這些私營公司有興趣,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡深入了解一個公司過去的表現。您可以在這個詳細的圖表中找到歷史營業收入和盈利。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。