share_log

With 73% Ownership of the Shares, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 73% Ownership of the Shares, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

摩根大通Alerian MLP指數ETN(紐交所:JPM)擁有73%的股份,主要由機構投資者主導。
Simply Wall St ·  04:50

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, JPMorgan Chase's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由於機構對股票的巨大持股比例,摩根大通的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策影響。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有公司45%的股份。
  • 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景

Every investor in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每個投資者在摩根大通Alerian MLP指數ETN(紐交所:JPM)都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。機構持有73%的股份,是公司中持股最多的集團。因此,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下跌則會損失最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構擁有巨額資本,他們的市場動作往往受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,投資於公司的機構資金通常被視爲對其未來的巨大信心投票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of JPMorgan Chase, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地探討摩根大通的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。

big
NYSE:JPM Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
紐交所:JPm 所有權結構 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JPMorgan Chase?

機構所有權告訴我們關於摩根大通的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

JPMorgan Chase already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at JPMorgan Chase's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

摩根大通的股份登記冊上已經有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中的信譽。然而,我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他所有人一樣。如果多家機構同時對一隻股票改變看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面摩根大通的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:JPM Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
紐交所:摩根大通收益和營業收入增長 2024年12月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in JPMorgan Chase. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 7.2% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到對摩根大通的對沖基金並沒有進行重大投資。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有9.7%的流通股份。貝萊德和道富銀行分別是第二和第三大股東,持有7.2%和4.5%的流通股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of JPMorgan Chase

摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase)的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$2.5b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士名下擁有的摩根大通Alerian MLP指數ETN股份不足1%。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有公司較大比例的股份是令人驚訝的。儘管他們的持股不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員集體擁有價值25億美金(按當前價格)的股份。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好的,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over JPMorgan Chase. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有26%股份的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對摩根大通有一定的影響力。雖然這種股份規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand JPMorgan Chase better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for JPMorgan Chase you should be aware of.

考慮一下擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解摩根大通,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 舉個例子:我們發現了 1 個您應該注意的摩根大通的警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論