share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Control 40% of Samsara Inc. (NYSE:IOT)

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Control 40% of Samsara Inc. (NYSE:IOT)

儘管近期有賣出,內部人士仍然控制着薩姆薩拉公司(紐交所:物聯網)40%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  12/25 20:50

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Samsara's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 內部人士似乎對Samsara的增長有既得利益,因爲他們擁有相當可觀的股份。
  • 前四大股東持有52%的股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

A look at the shareholders of Samsara Inc. (NYSE:IOT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 40% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看Samsara Inc.(紐交所:IOT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。 持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔40%,確切地說,是個人內部人士。 換句話說,這個群體在其對公司的投資中,最有可能獲得最大收益(或承受最大損失)。

And insiders own the top position in the company's share registry despite recent sales.

儘管最近有出售,但內部人士在公司的股東名冊中仍擁有最高地位。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Samsara.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能夠告訴我們關於Samsara的信息。

big
NYSE:IOT Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
紐交所:物聯網 所有權分解 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Samsara?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Samsara什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Samsara already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Samsara's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Samsara已經在股份登記上有了機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視了這隻股票並對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看下面Samsara的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:IOT Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
紐交所:物聯網2024年12月25日的收益與營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Samsara. With a 19% stake, CEO Sanjit Biswas is the largest shareholder. With 18% and 9.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, John Bicket and Andreessen Horowitz LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, John Bicket is also Top Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在Samsara的股份不多。CEO Sanjit Biswas持有19%的股份,是最大股東。John Bicket和Andreessen Horowitz LLC分別持有18%和9.3%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,第二大股東John Bicket也是公司的高層管理人員,再次表明公司的主要股東中有着強大的內部持股情況。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了一個事實,即公司約52%的股份由前四大股東控制,這表明這些股東在業務上具有重要影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Samsara

Samsara的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Samsara Inc.. Insiders own US$10b worth of shares in the US$26b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有Samsara Inc.公司的相當大比例股份。內部人士在這家價值260億美元的公司中擁有價值100億美元的股份。這是相當有意義的。看到這樣的投資水平真是不錯。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Samsara. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個別投資者,持有Samsara 11%的股份。雖然這個持股規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 9.3% stake in Samsara. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司持有Samsara 9.3%的股份。這表明他們對關鍵政策決策可能有影響力。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓勵,因爲股權投資在某些情況下能夠推動策略,使市場意識到公司的價值。或者,這些持有者可能是在將公司上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Samsara better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Samsara .

考慮公司中不同持股群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解Samsara,我們需要考慮其他許多因素。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的Samsara的3個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論