Root, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ROOT) Institutional Investors Lost 4.8% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Root, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ROOT) Institutional Investors Lost 4.8% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Root's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 顯著較高的機構持股意味着Root的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 共有11位投資者在公司中擁有52%的多數股份。
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Root, Inc.(納斯達克:ROOT),理解業務的股權結構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔39%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.1b last week. However, the 570% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
上週,隨着公司市值降至11億美元,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。然而,570%的年度股東回報可能幫助減輕了他們的痛苦。不過,他們應該對未來可能的進一步損失保持警惕。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Root.
讓我們更近一步了解不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Root的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Root?
機構持股對我們了解Root有什麼啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Root already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Root, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Root已經在股東註冊中擁有機構的存在。事實上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中擁有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖售出同一支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看Root過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Root. Ribbit Management Company, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 9.6% and 7.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Christopher Olsen and Alexander Timm are the second and third largest shareholders. Alexander Timm, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
對沖基金在Root公司的股份不多。Ribbit管理公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有9.7%的流通股。Christopher Olsen和Alexander Timm分別是第二和第三大股東,持有9.6%和7.4%的流通股。第三大股東Alexander Timm同時還擔任董事會主席。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更詳細地看一下我們的持股數據,前11大股東的合計持股比例爲52%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Root
Root的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Root, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$228m stake in this US$1.1b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有Root, Inc.一個合理比例的股份。看到內部人士在這家11億美元的企業中擁有22800萬美元的重大股份是非常有趣的。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問這個顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司25%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能決定公司事務,但它肯定可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 15%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有15%股份的股權投資公司能夠在以創造價值爲重點的企業策略制定中發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲股權投資公司有時是激進投資者,要求管理層負責。但有時,股權投資公司則在公司上市後選擇賣出。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Root (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得了解一個公司到底是誰擁有的非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如,我們發現Root有3個警告信號(其中1個讓我們有點不安!),在這裏投資之前你應該了解這些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。