Comerica Incorporated's (NYSE:CMA) Institutional Investors Lost 6.9% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Comerica Incorporated's (NYSE:CMA) Institutional Investors Lost 6.9% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Comerica's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 鑑於機構在股票中擁有大量股份,聯信銀行的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 共有12位投資者在公司中持有多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Comerica Incorporated (NYSE:CMA) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察聯信銀行(紐交所:CMA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。機構佔據了87%的股份,爲公司持有最大的股票。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$8.0b last week. However, the 18% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
機構投資者是受公司市值上週跌至80億美元后影響最嚴重的群體。不過,股東們18%的年度回報可能緩解了這一打擊。然而,我們認爲他們會在未來關注潛在的弱點。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Comerica.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於聯信銀行的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Comerica?
機構所有權告訴我們關於聯信銀行什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Comerica. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Comerica's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在聯信銀行擁有相當多的股份。這在專業投資者中建議了一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間對某隻股票改變看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看聯信銀行的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Comerica. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 3.8% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的流通股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在聯信銀行的股份較少。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,持有15%的流通股份。先鋒集團公司是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,道富銀行全球顧問公司持有大約3.8%的公司股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記,我們可以看到前12位股東控制了50%的股份,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Comerica
聯信銀行的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Comerica Incorporated insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$47m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,聯信銀行的內部人士持有不到1%的股份。由於規模龐大,我們不期望內部人士擁有大量股票。總的來說,他們持有價值4700萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在購買股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Comerica. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆持有12%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對聯信銀行有一定的影響力。這種規模的持股雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Comerica better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Comerica that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解聯信銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們發現了2個聯信銀行的警告信號,你在這裏投資前應該注意這些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。