The Returns At Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) Aren't Growing
The Returns At Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) Aren't Growing
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. Having said that, from a first glance at Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
如果我們想找到一個可以長期增長的股票,我們應該尋找哪些基本趨勢?首先,我們需要識別出一個不斷增長的資本回報率(ROCE),同時還有一個不斷增加的資本使用基礎。最終,這表明這是一個以不斷提高的回報率再投資利潤的業務。也就是說,從對牛津工業(紐交所:OXM)的初步觀察來看,我們對回報趨勢並沒有感到特別興奮,但讓我們深入看看。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本回報率(ROCE):它是什麼?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Oxford Industries is:
對於那些不知道的人來說,ROCE是公司的年度稅前利潤(其回報)與業務中使用的資本之間的關係。牛津工業的計算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.13 = US$132m ÷ (US$1.2b - US$217m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to November 2024).
0.13 = 13200萬美元 ÷ (12億 - 2.17億)(基於截至2024年11月的過去十二個月)。
Therefore, Oxford Industries has an ROCE of 13%. That's a pretty standard return and it's in line with the industry average of 13%.
因此,牛津工業的ROCE爲13%。這是相當標準的回報,符合行業平均水平13%。
In the above chart we have measured Oxford Industries' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Oxford Industries .
在上面的圖表中,我們測量了牛津工業之前的資本回報率(ROCE)與其之前的表現,但未來的重要性或許更大。如果您想了解分析師對牛津工業未來的預測,您應該查看我們免費的分析師報告。
So How Is Oxford Industries' ROCE Trending?
那麼,牛津工業的資本回報率(ROCE)走勢如何?
There hasn't been much to report for Oxford Industries' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Oxford Industries in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. This probably explains why Oxford Industries is paying out 46% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Given the business isn't reinvesting in itself, it makes sense to distribute a portion of earnings among shareholders.
過去五年來,牛津工業的收益和資本使用水平沒有太多變化,因爲這兩個指標一直保持穩定。在觀察一個成熟而穩定的業務時,這種情況並不罕見,因爲它可能已經過了重新投資收益的階段。因此,除非我們看到牛津工業在資本回報率(ROCE)和額外投資方面發生重大變化,否則我們不太寄希望於它成爲一個多倍回報的投資。這也許能夠解釋爲什麼牛津工業將其收入的46%以分紅派息的形式支付給股東。考慮到該業務並沒有自我再投資,向股東分配部分收益是有意義的。
Our Take On Oxford Industries' ROCE
我們對牛津工業資本回報率(ROCE)的看法
In summary, Oxford Industries isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. Unsurprisingly, the stock has only gained 20% over the last five years, which potentially indicates that investors are accounting for this going forward. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options.
總而言之,牛津工業並沒有複利增加其收益,而是在使用同樣的資本下產生穩定的回報。毫無疑問,這隻股票在過去五年中僅上漲了20%,這可能表明投資者已經考慮到這一點。因此,如果您正在尋找一個多倍回報的投資,我們建議您考慮其他期權。
If you'd like to know about the risks facing Oxford Industries, we've discovered 3 warning signs that you should be aware of.
如果您想了解牛津工業面臨的風險,我們發現了3個您需要注意的警告信號。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想尋找具有良好收益的穩健公司,可以查看這份擁有良好資產負債表和令人印象深刻的股本回報率的免費公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。