Capital Allocation Trends At Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) Aren't Ideal
Capital Allocation Trends At Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) Aren't Ideal
Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after investigating Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
你知道有一些財務指標可以提供潛在多倍收益股的線索嗎?首先,我們希望看到一個逐漸增加的已投資資本回報率(ROCE),其次是不斷擴大的已投資資本基礎。如果你看到這些,通常意味着這是一家擁有良好商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。然而,在調查了Shake Shack(紐交所:SHAK)後,我們認爲它當前的趨勢不符合多倍收益股的標準。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
什麼是資本回報率(ROCE)?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Shake Shack is:
對於那些不確定什麼是ROCE的人來說,它衡量的是公司從其業務中已投資資本產生的稅前利潤。對Shake Shack的計算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.018 = US$26m ÷ (US$1.7b - US$176m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.018 = 2600萬美金 ÷ (17億美金 - 176百萬美金)(基於截至2024年9月的過去12個月)。
Therefore, Shake Shack has an ROCE of 1.8%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Hospitality industry average of 9.1%.
因此,Shake Shack的ROCE爲1.8%。絕對值來看,這一回報率較低,並且也低於酒店行業平均水平的9.1%。
In the above chart we have measured Shake Shack's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Shake Shack for free.
在上面的圖表中,我們對Shake Shack之前的資本回報率(ROCE)進行了測量,並與其之前的表現進行了比較,但未來的表現或許更爲重要。如果您願意,可以免費查看分析師對Shake Shack的預測。
What Can We Tell From Shake Shack's ROCE Trend?
我們能從Shake Shack的ROCE趨勢中得出什麼?
When we looked at the ROCE trend at Shake Shack, we didn't gain much confidence. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 3.8%, but since then they've fallen to 1.8%. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run.
當我們觀察Shake Shack的ROCE趨勢時,我們並沒有獲得太多信心。大約五年前,資本回報率爲3.8%,但自那以來已降至1.8%。儘管如此,考慮到營業收入和用於業務的資產都在增加,這可能表明公司正在投資於增長,而額外的資本導致了ROCE的短期下降。如果增加的資本能夠產生額外的回報,那麼業務及其股東將在長期受益。
The Bottom Line
總結
Even though returns on capital have fallen in the short term, we find it promising that revenue and capital employed have both increased for Shake Shack. And the stock has done incredibly well with a 116% return over the last five years, so long term investors are no doubt ecstatic with that result. So while the underlying trends could already be accounted for by investors, we still think this stock is worth looking into further.
即使短期內資本回報率下降,我們發現Shake Shack的營業收入和所用資本均有所增加,這令人感到鼓舞。在過去五年中,股票的表現非常出色,回報率達到116%,因此長期投資者無疑對這一結果感到非常滿意。因此,儘管基本趨勢可能已經被投資者考慮在內,但我們仍然認爲這隻股票值得進一步關注。
One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with Shake Shack and understanding it should be part of your investment process.
還有一件事要注意,我們發現Shake Shack有1個警告信號,了解這一點應該是您投資過程的一部分。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
對於喜歡投資於穩健公司的投資者,可以查看這個免費的穩健資產負債表和高股本回報率公司的列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。