share_log

Merck (NYSE:MRK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Merck (NYSE:MRK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

默沙東 (紐交所:MRK) 資產負債表相當健康
Simply Wall St ·  12/21 22:23

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

有些人認爲,波動性而不是債務是投資者考慮風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾著名地表示「波動性遠非風險的同義詞。」 當你審查一家公司有多風險時,自然會考慮公司的資產負債表,因爲債務通常在企業崩潰時涉及其中。 重要的是,默沙東公司(紐交所代碼:MRK)確實有債務。 但這對股東來說是一種擔憂嗎?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務在企業能夠用新資本或自由現金流償還時是有幫助的。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是『創造性毀滅』的過程,失敗的企業會被其銀行家無情地清算。 然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,企業必須在低價股份中稀釋股東,僅僅是爲了讓債務得到控制。 但通過替換稀釋,債務對於那些需要資本以高回報率進行增長投資的企業來說,可以是一種極好的工具。 在考慮公司債務水平時,第一步是將其現金和債務一起考慮。

What Is Merck's Net Debt?

默沙東的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Merck had US$38.1b of debt, an increase on US$34.9b, over one year. However, it does have US$14.6b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$23.5b.

你可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示截至2024年9月,默沙東擁有381億美元的債務,較一年前的349億美元有所增加。 然而,它有146億美元的現金抵消了這一點,使得淨債務約爲235億美元。

big
NYSE:MRK Debt to Equity History December 21st 2024
紐交所:MRK 債務與股本歷史 2024年12月21日

A Look At Merck's Liabilities

回顧默沙東的負債情況

The latest balance sheet data shows that Merck had liabilities of US$29.6b due within a year, and liabilities of US$43.4b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$14.6b as well as receivables valued at US$12.5b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$45.8b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,默沙東有296億美元的負債在一年內到期,434億美元的負債在此之後到期。 抵消這些義務,它有146億美元的現金以及價值125億美元的12個月內應收賬款。 因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出458億美元。

Given Merck has a humongous market capitalization of US$251.7b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

鑑於默沙東擁有2517億美元的龐大市值,很難相信這些負債構成多少威脅。 話雖如此,很明顯我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以免情況變得更糟。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了衡量一家公司相對於其收益的債務水平,我們計算其淨負債與利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及其利息和稅項前利潤(EBIT)與其利息支出(利息支付比率)的比率。因此,我們考慮了包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務的情況。

Merck has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.0. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 20.7 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On the other hand, Merck saw its EBIT drop by 9.8% in the last twelve months. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Merck can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

默沙東的淨債務與EBITDA的比率僅爲1.0。 而其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋其利息支出,規模是其20.7倍。 因此,我們對它超保守的債務使用相對放鬆。 另一方面,默沙東在過去的12個月中,其EBIT下降了9.8%。 如果這種下降持續下去,顯然將讓債務更難處理。 毫無疑問,我們通過資產負債表了解到債務的很多信息。 但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定默沙東是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果你想了解專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Merck produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 73% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,一家公司只能用現金來償還債務,而不是會計利潤。 因此,我們總是檢查EBIT中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。 在過去的三年中,默沙東產生了良好的自由現金流,佔其EBIT的73%,大約是我們所期望的。 這種自由現金流讓公司在適當的時候能夠有良好的能力償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Merck's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. All these things considered, it appears that Merck can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Merck is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

值得高興的是,默沙東令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率意味着它在債務上佔據上風。但是,從一個更加嚴肅的角度來看,我們對其EBIT增長率有些擔憂。考慮到這些因素,默沙東似乎可以舒適地應對其當前的債務水平。好的一面是,這種槓桿可以提升股東回報,但潛在的 downside 是風險增加,因此值得關注資產負債表。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個開始的地方。然而,所有的投資風險並不全在資產負債表中,遠非如此。請注意,默沙東在我們的投資分析中顯示出兩個警告信號,您應該了解......

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論