Bunge Global SA's (NYSE:BG) Latest 4.3% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Bunge Global SA's (NYSE:BG) Latest 4.3% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Bunge Global implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構在邦吉全球的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價具有重要影響。
- 50%的業務由前12大股東持有。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
Every investor in Bunge Global SA (NYSE:BG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每個在邦吉全球SA(紐交所:BG)投資者都應該了解最強大的股東團體。我們可以看到機構擁有公司81%的股份,擁有絕大部分股權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 4.3% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 20% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Bunge Global, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
機構投資者上週看到其持有的價值下降了4.3%。不必說,最近的損失進一步增加了股東一年來20%的損失,可能不會讓這一類股東感到滿意。機構或稱「流動性提供者」掌控着大量資金,因此,這類投資者通常對股票價格走勢有很大影響。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續,機構可能面臨出售邦吉全球的壓力,這可能對散戶投資者產生負面影響。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bunge Global.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於邦吉全球的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bunge Global?
機構持股情況對邦吉全球有何影響?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
Bunge Global already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bunge Global's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
邦吉全球在股東名冊上已經有機構存在。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人都一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到邦吉全球的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,這背後總還有更多故事。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Bunge Global. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 8.3% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對邦吉全球而言,對沖基金的股份並不多。 先鋒集團(Vanguard Group, Inc.)目前是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。 貝萊德(BlackRock, Inc.)是第二大股東,擁有10%的普通股,而資本研究與管理公司(Capital Research and Management Company)持有約8.3%的公司股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前12名股東合計持有公司50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司施加重大控制。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構的持股是一種很好的方式,可以評估和篩選股票的預期表現。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,您可以很容易地查找預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Bunge Global
邦吉全球的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Bunge Global SA in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$91m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士以其自己的名義持有邦吉全球公司的股份不足1%。由於這是一個大公司,我們只會期望內部人士持有一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值9100萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,觀察那些內部人士是買入還是賣出會更有趣。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bunge Global. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆持有18%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對邦吉全球公司有一定的影響。雖然這一群體不一定能做主,但確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Bunge Global , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我發現查看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。考慮到投資風險的時刻存在的擔憂。我們發現了邦吉全球的一個警告信號,理解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。