Is ResMed (NYSE:RMD) Using Too Much Debt?
Is ResMed (NYSE:RMD) Using Too Much Debt?
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that ResMed Inc. (NYSE:RMD) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過:『波動性遠非風險的同義詞。』 因此,當你考慮任何特定股票的風險時,顯然需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會使一家公司陷入困境。我們可以看到,瑞思邁公司(紐交所:RMD)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是,股東們應該對此債務的使用感到擔憂嗎?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時會變得危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
當企業無法輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會變得具有風險,無論是通過自由現金流還是以吸引人的價格籌集資本。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所獲。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,它不得不以低價格籌集新的股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長而沒有任何負面後果。考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務的總體情況。
How Much Debt Does ResMed Carry?
瑞思邁的債務有多少?
As you can see below, ResMed had US$677.5m of debt at September 2024, down from US$1.36b a year prior. However, it does have US$442.6m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$234.9m.
正如您在下面看到的,截止到2024年9月,瑞思邁擁有67750萬美元的債務,較一年前的13.6億美元有所減少。然而,它有44260萬美元的現金作爲抵消,導致淨債務約爲23490萬美元。
How Healthy Is ResMed's Balance Sheet?
瑞思邁的資產負債表健康狀況如何?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that ResMed had liabilities of US$904.1m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.12b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$442.6m as well as receivables valued at US$855.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$729.8m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到瑞思邁的負債爲90410萬美元,12個月內到期;負債爲11.2億美元,超出這個期限。抵消這些義務,它有現金44260萬美元,以及12個月內到期的應收賬款85500萬美元。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出72980萬美元。
Since publicly traded ResMed shares are worth a very impressive total of US$33.8b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Carrying virtually no net debt, ResMed has a very light debt load indeed.
考慮到公開交易的瑞思邁股份總值高達338億美元,這樣的負債水平似乎不太可能會造成重大威脅。話雖如此,很明顯我們應該繼續關注其資產負債表,以免情況變得更糟。瑞思邁幾乎沒有淨債務,負債負擔確實很輕。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們使用兩個主要比率來了解相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是它的息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出的次數(或者簡稱爲利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
ResMed's net debt is only 0.14 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 41.0 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Another good sign is that ResMed has been able to increase its EBIT by 27% in twelve months, making it easier to pay down debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ResMed can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
瑞思邁的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.14倍。而且它的EBIT可以覆蓋其利息支出高達41.0倍。因此,我們對其超保守的債務使用感到相當放鬆。另一個好跡象是,瑞思邁在十二個月內能夠將其EBIT提高27%,使得償還債務更容易。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。但歸根結底,業務未來的盈利能力將決定瑞思邁是否能夠隨着時間的推移增強其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,展示分析師的利潤預測。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, ResMed produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 67% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤是無法滿足的。因此,值得檢查一下EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去的三年中,瑞思邁產生了堅挺的自由現金流,佔其EBIT的67%,這大約是我們所期望的。這筆自由現金流使公司在適當的時候能夠償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
ResMed's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. It's also worth noting that ResMed is in the Medical Equipment industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. It looks ResMed has no trouble standing on its own two feet, and it has no reason to fear its lenders. For investing nerds like us its balance sheet is almost charming. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with ResMed , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
瑞思邁的利息保障程度表明它能夠輕鬆應對債務,就像克里斯蒂亞諾·羅納爾多在一個14歲以下的守門員面前進球一樣輕鬆。 而這僅僅是好消息的開始,因爲它的淨負債與EBITDA比率也非常令人振奮。 值得注意的是,瑞思邁處於醫療設備行業,這通常被認爲是相當防禦性的。 看來瑞思邁在獨立站穩腳跟方面沒有任何問題,也沒有理由害怕債權人。 對於像我們這樣的投資愛好者來說,它的資產負債表幾乎是迷人的。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的地方。 然而,並非所有的投資風險都在資產負債表內 - 遠非如此。 我們已經識別出瑞思邁存在一個警示信號,理解這些信號應該是你投資過程中不可或缺的一部分。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。