share_log

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

鏗騰電子(納斯達克:CDNS)似乎使用債務相對謹慎。
Simply Wall St ·  12/20 18:51

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

傳奇基金經理李錄(查理·芒格支持的人)曾說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性的資本損失。」 當你研究一家公司有多風險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲債務往往在企業倒閉時涉及到。 重要的是,鏗騰電子公司(納斯達克:CDNS)確實帶有債務。 但更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多大的風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時會變得危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

當一家企業無法輕鬆履行債務和其他負債時,這些負債就會變得風險高,可能是因爲自有自由現金流不足或者無法以有吸引力的價格籌集資本。資本主義的一部分是「創造性毀滅」的過程,失敗的企業會被其銀行家毫不留情地清算。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是它不得不以低價籌集新的股本,從而永久性稀釋股東權益。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,而沒有任何負面後果。在考慮一家企業使用多少債務時,首先要查看它的現金與債務的結合情況。

How Much Debt Does Cadence Design Systems Carry?

鏗騰電子公司揹負了多少債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Cadence Design Systems had US$2.83b of debt, an increase on US$648.8m, over one year. However, it does have US$2.94b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of US$116.1m.

您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但它顯示截至2024年9月,鏗騰電子的債務爲28.3億美元,比64880萬美元增加了一年。 然而,它確實有29.4億美元的現金來抵消這部分,使淨現金爲11610萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:CDNS Debt to Equity History December 20th 2024
納斯達克GS:CDNS債務與股權歷史 2024年12月20日

How Strong Is Cadence Design Systems' Balance Sheet?

鏗騰電子的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Cadence Design Systems had liabilities of US$1.67b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.93b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$2.94b as well as receivables valued at US$612.3m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.05b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

從最新的資產負債表可以看出,鏗騰電子的負債爲16.7億美元,需在一年內到期,還有29.3億美元的負債需要更長時間償還。抵消這些義務,它擁有29.4億美元的現金,以及價值61230萬美元的應收賬款,需在12個月內收回。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款多出10.5億美元。

This state of affairs indicates that Cadence Design Systems' balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So it's very unlikely that the US$82.6b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, Cadence Design Systems boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

這種情況表明,鏗騰電子的資產負債表看起來相當穩固,因爲它的總負債幾乎等於其流動資產。因此,這家市值826億美元的公司短期內資金緊張的可能性很小,但仍然值得關注資產負債表。儘管負債顯著,鏗騰電子的淨現金狀況良好,因此可以公平地說它沒有沉重的債務負擔!

And we also note warmly that Cadence Design Systems grew its EBIT by 11% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Cadence Design Systems's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

我們還要溫暖地指出,鏗騰電子去年EBIT增長了11%,使得其債務負擔更易於處理。分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。但未來的收益,尤其是收入,將判斷鏗騰電子在未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. Cadence Design Systems may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the last three years, Cadence Design Systems recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 94% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.

但我們的最終考量同樣重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要冷硬的現金。鏗騰電子可能在資產負債表上擁有淨現金,但觀察企業如何將息稅前利潤(EBIT)轉化爲自由現金流仍然很有趣,因爲這將影響其對債務的需求以及管理債務的能力。在過去三年中,鏗騰電子記錄的自由現金流佔EBIT的94%,這比我們通常期待的要強勁。這使得它在償還債務方面處於非常強勁的地位。

Summing Up

總結

We could understand if investors are concerned about Cadence Design Systems's liabilities, but we can be reassured by the fact it has has net cash of US$116.1m. And it impressed us with free cash flow of US$952m, being 94% of its EBIT. So is Cadence Design Systems's debt a risk? It doesn't seem so to us. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Cadence Design Systems, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

我們可以理解投資者對鏗騰電子的負債感到擔憂,但我們可以放心的是,它的淨現金爲11610萬美元。並且它的自由現金流達到了95200萬美元,佔其EBIT的94%。那麼,鏗騰電子的債務是風險嗎?在我們看來似乎不是。隨着時間的推移,股票價格往往會跟隨每股收益,因此如果你對鏗騰電子感興趣,可以點擊這裏查看其每股收益歷史的互動圖表。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

無論最終結果如何,有時候更容易關注那些根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費獲取一份淨債務爲零的成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論