Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Landsea Homes Corporation's (NASDAQ:LSEA) Recent US$53m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Landsea Homes Corporation's (NASDAQ:LSEA) Recent US$53m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Landsea Homes implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在朗詩地產的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價具有顯著影響。
- 共有15位投資者在公司擁有50%的控股權。
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
Every investor in Landsea Homes Corporation (NASDAQ:LSEA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
朗詩地產公司(納斯達克:LSEA)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東群體。 持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔51%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$343m last week after a 14% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 30% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Landsea Homes' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
因此,在公司市值在上週因股價下跌14%而降至34300萬美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。 最近的損失,使股東面臨一年30%的損失,可能讓這群投資者感到不快。 機構或稱「流動性提供者」控制着大量資金,因此,這類投資者通常對股票價格波動有很大的影響力。 因此,如果Landsea Homes的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到被迫賣出該股票,這對個人投資者來說可能並不是理想的選擇。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Landsea Homes.
在下面的圖表中,我們關注Landsea Homes不同的所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Landsea Homes?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Landsea Homes的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Landsea Homes. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Landsea Homes, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所見,機構投資者在Landsea Homes中擁有相當的股份。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,檢查Landsea Homes過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Landsea Homes. Landsea Holdings Corporation is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 3.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that John Ho, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以共同施加重大影響力。對蘭州海洋公司的對沖基金持有的股份並不多。蘭州控股公司目前是公司的最大股東,持有17%的流通股。同時,第二第三大股東分別持有5.9%和3.1%的流通股。此外,我們發現首席執行官約翰·霍名下分配了1.1%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前15大股東合計擁有50%的公司股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Landsea Homes
蘭州海洋的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Landsea Homes Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$20m worth of stock in the US$343m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,內部人確實擁有Landsea Homes Corporation的股份。內部投資者以自己的名義擁有價值2000萬美元的股票,而該公司的市值爲34300萬美元。有些人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。但值得檢查一下這些內部人是否有在賣出股份。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中持有26%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種規模的持有是相當可觀的,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 17%, of the Landsea Homes stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
私營公司似乎持有17%的Landsea Homes股票。可能值得深入研究一下。如果相關方,比如內部人士,對這些私營公司有利益關係,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司可能對該公司也有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Landsea Homes has 4 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
我發現了解一家公司具體的所有權很有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——Landsea Homes有4個警示信號(還有1個讓我們感到不安的信號),我們認爲你應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。