share_log

Institutional Investors in City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO) Lost 6.7% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO) Lost 6.7% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

在市控股公司(納斯達克:CHCO)中,機構投資者上週損失了6.7%,但已經獲得了長期增長的好處。
Simply Wall St ·  12/19 18:06

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in City Holding implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在City Holding的 substantial 持股意味着它們對公司股價有重要影響。
  • 前十大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

If you want to know who really controls City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正掌控了City Holding Company (納斯達克:CHCO),那麼你必須查看其股東登記的構成。機構持有73%的股份,在公司中擁有最大份額。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.7% last week. Still, the 12% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

在投資中虧損是所有股東都不喜歡的事情,尤其是那些上週其持股價值下降了6.7%的機構投資者。儘管如此,12%的年度收益可能在一定程度上緩解了他們的整體損失。但他們可能會對未來的虧損保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of City Holding, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討一下City Holding的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:CHCO Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
納斯達克交易所:CHCO 所有權結構 2024年12月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About City Holding?

機構持股告訴我們關於City Holding的哪些信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in City Holding. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see City Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在City Holding中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界有一定的可信度。然而,最好還是對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂確認保持謹慎。他們有時也會出錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,通常會存在它們在『擁擠交易』中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個參與者可能會爭相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險通常更高。您可以在下面看到City Holding的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:CHCO Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
納斯達克證券交易所:CHCO收益和營業收入增長2024年12月19日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. City Holding is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.5% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。City Holding並不被對沖基金持有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是貝萊德(BlackRock, Inc.),持有15%的流通股份。先鋒集團(Vanguard Group, Inc.)是第二大股東,擁有12%的普通股,而道富銀行全球顧問(State Street Global Advisors, Inc.)持有約4.5%的公司股票。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了一些深入研究,發現十大股東約佔股東名冊的51%,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of City Holding

City Holding的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in City Holding Company. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$42m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實擁有City Holding公司的股票。 這是一個相當大的公司,因此看到某種潛在的有意義的對齊通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約4200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人士對齊的問題,您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有公司25%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with City Holding (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant) .

我發現了解誰具體擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的關於City Holding的兩個警告信號(其中一個有點不愉快)。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論