Declining Stock and Solid Fundamentals: Is The Market Wrong About MGP Ingredients, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGPI)?
Declining Stock and Solid Fundamentals: Is The Market Wrong About MGP Ingredients, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGPI)?
With its stock down 48% over the past three months, it is easy to disregard MGP Ingredients (NASDAQ:MGPI). However, a closer look at its sound financials might cause you to think again. Given that fundamentals usually drive long-term market outcomes, the company is worth looking at. In this article, we decided to focus on MGP Ingredients' ROE.
在過去三個月中,MGP Ingredients(納斯達克:MGPI)的股票下跌了48%,很容易忽視這家公司。然而,仔細查看其穩健的財務狀況可能會讓你重新考慮。考慮到基本面通常驅動長期市場結果,這家公司值得關注。在這篇文章中,我們決定重點關注MGP Ingredients的ROE。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
淨資產收益率(ROE)是一項測試,旨在評估公司如何有效地增長其價值並管理投資者資金。換句話說,它是一個盈利能力比率,衡量由公司股東提供的資本的回報率。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股東權益回報率?
The formula for ROE is:
roe的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for MGP Ingredients is:
因此,根據以上公式,MGP Ingredients的roe爲:
12% = US$108m ÷ US$913m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
12% = 10800萬美元 ÷ 91300萬美元(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.12 in profit.
'回報'是年度利潤。另一種理解是,對於每1美元的股本,該公司能夠獲得0.12美元的利潤。
What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?
roe與盈利增長有何關係?
Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.
到目前爲止,我們了解到ROE衡量的是公司產生利潤的效率。根據公司再投資或"保留"這些利潤的多少,以及它的有效性,我們能夠評估公司的收益增長潛力。在其他條件相同的情況下,既有較高的權益回報率又有較高利潤保留的公司通常比沒有這些特徵的公司擁有更高的增長率。
MGP Ingredients' Earnings Growth And 12% ROE
MGP Ingredients的收益增長和12%的ROE
To start with, MGP Ingredients' ROE looks acceptable. Yet, the fact that the company's ROE is lower than the industry average of 16% does temper our expectations. However, we are pleased to see the impressive 22% net income growth reported by MGP Ingredients over the past five years. We reckon that there could be other factors at play here. Such as - high earnings retention or an efficient management in place. However, not to forget, the company does have a decent ROE to begin with, just that it is lower than the industry average. So this also does lend some color to the high earnings growth seen by the company.
首先,MGP Ingredients的ROE看起來是可以接受的。然而,該公司的ROE低於16%的行業平均水平,這確實降低了我們的期望。然而,我們很高興看到MGP Ingredients在過去五年中報告的22%的淨利潤增長。我們認爲可能還有其他因素在發揮作用,例如:高收益留存或有效的管理。然而,不要忘記,該公司的ROE起初也是相當不錯的,只是低於行業平均水平。因此,這也爲公司所見的高收益增長增添了一些色彩。
Next, on comparing with the industry net income growth, we found that MGP Ingredients' growth is quite high when compared to the industry average growth of 11% in the same period, which is great to see.
接下來,在與行業淨利潤增長進行比較時,我們發現MGP Ingredients的增長在相同期間較行業平均增長11%時,增長相當高,這令人欣慰。
The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. One good indicator of expected earnings growth is the P/E ratio which determines the price the market is willing to pay for a stock based on its earnings prospects. So, you may want to check if MGP Ingredients is trading on a high P/E or a low P/E, relative to its industry.
給公司估值的基礎在很大程度上與其盈利增長相關。 投資者接下來需要判斷的是,預期的盈利增長或缺乏盈利增長是否已經反映在股價中。 這樣,他們將對股票是否在進入清澈的水域還是面臨沼澤的水域有一個認識。 預期盈利增長的一個良好指標是市盈率,它決定了市場願意爲股票支付的價格,基於其盈利前景。因此,您可能需要檢查一下MGP Ingredients的市盈率是相對高還是低。
Is MGP Ingredients Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?
MGP Ingredients是否有效地再投資其利潤?
MGP Ingredients' three-year median payout ratio to shareholders is 10.0%, which is quite low. This implies that the company is retaining 90% of its profits. So it seems like the management is reinvesting profits heavily to grow its business and this reflects in its earnings growth number.
MGP Ingredients三年的中位數股東支付比率爲10.0%,這相當低。這意味着公司保留了90%的利潤。因此,管理層似乎正在大量再投資利潤以發展其業務,而這反映在其盈利增長數字上。
Besides, MGP Ingredients has been paying dividends for at least ten years or more. This shows that the company is committed to sharing profits with its shareholders. Our latest analyst data shows that the future payout ratio of the company over the next three years is expected to be approximately 10%.
此外,MGP Ingredients至少支付了十年的分紅。這表明公司致力於與股東分享利潤。我們的最新分析師數據顯示,預計公司在未來三年的支付比率將約爲10%。
Conclusion
結論
Overall, we are quite pleased with MGP Ingredients' performance. In particular, it's great to see that the company has seen significant growth in its earnings backed by a respectable ROE and a high reinvestment rate. With that said, on studying the latest analyst forecasts, we found that while the company has seen growth in its past earnings, analysts expect its future earnings to shrink. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.
總體而言,我們對MGP Ingredients的表現非常滿意。特別是看到公司盈利顯著增長,且具備良好的ROE和高再投資率,這一點非常好。儘管如此,在研究最新的分析師預測時,我們發現,雖然公司過去的盈利有所增長,但分析師們預計其未來盈利將會縮水。這些分析師的預期是基於行業的整體預期,還是基於公司的基本面?點擊這裏查看我們對該公司分析師的預測頁面。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。