With 73% Institutional Ownership, Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 73% Institutional Ownership, Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Cathay General Bancorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構在股票中的大額持股,國泰萬通金控的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前十大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
If you want to know who really controls Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 73% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制國泰萬通金控(納斯達克:CATY),那麼你需要查看其股東登記的構成。持有最大份額的一組是機構,擁有73%的股份。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中可能獲得最大收益(或失去最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構投資者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往會產生很大的影響,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,在一家公司中擁有相當數量的機構資金投資,通常被視爲一個值得稱讚的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cathay General Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解國泰萬通金控的每種所有者類型,從下方的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cathay General Bancorp?
機構所有權告訴我們關於國泰萬通金控什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cathay General Bancorp. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cathay General Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所見,機構投資者在國泰萬通金控中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師對這隻股票進行了分析,並且他們對此表示認可。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下降。因此,值得查看國泰萬通金控的盈利歷史,當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cathay General Bancorp. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。 我們注意到對國泰萬通金控的對沖基金並沒有重大投資。 我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有15%的流通股份。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有11%和5.9%的流通股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前十大股東佔股份登記的一半以上,還有一些較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Cathay General Bancorp
國泰萬通金控的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Cathay General Bancorp. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$168m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告內部人士確實擁有國泰萬通金控的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的對齊通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約16800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人士對齊的問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Cathay General Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有國泰萬通金控22%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能決定公司事務,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Cathay General Bancorp that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如,我們已識別出國泰萬通金控的一個警告信號,您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。