Is TEGNA (NYSE:TGNA) A Risky Investment?
Is TEGNA (NYSE:TGNA) A Risky Investment?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that TEGNA Inc. (NYSE:TGNA) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
有些人認爲,作爲投資者,波動性而非債務是思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾名言:『波動性遠非風險的同義詞。』所以當你思考任何特定股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到TEGNA公司(紐交所:TGNA)確實在其業務中使用債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使公司變得風險更高。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果一家公司無力償還其債權人,那麼它就處於債權人的支配之下。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是『創造性毀滅』的過程,即失敗的企業被其銀行家無情地清算。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們確實常常看到負債公司因債權人迫使其以低價籌集資金而永久稀釋股東的權益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理管理其債務,並使之惠及自身。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用時,我們首先會將現金與債務結合起來查看。
What Is TEGNA's Debt?
TEGNA的債務是多少?
As you can see below, TEGNA had US$3.08b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it does have US$536.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$2.54b.
正如下方所示,截止2024年9月,TEGNA的債務爲30.8億美金,與前一年大致相同。你可以點擊圖表查看更詳細的信息。然而,它有53630萬美金現金來抵消這部分債務,導致淨債務約爲25.4億美金。
How Healthy Is TEGNA's Balance Sheet?
TEGNA的資產負債表健康狀況如何?
The latest balance sheet data shows that TEGNA had liabilities of US$466.7m due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.84b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$536.3m in cash and US$615.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$3.16b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,TEGNA有46670萬美元的短期負債,38.4億美元的長期負債。因此,總負債比其現金和短期應收賬款之和多出31.6億美元。
When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$2.97b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.
考慮到這種缺口超過了公司29.7億美元的市值,你可能會傾向於仔細審視資產負債表。假設,如果公司不得不通過當前股價融資來償還債務,則需要極高的稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看公司的淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及計算息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息費用的能力(利息保障率),來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力的情況。這種方法的優勢在於,我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(通過淨債務與EBITDA的比率)和與該債務相關的實際利息費用(通過其利息保障率)。
TEGNA's debt is 3.3 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 4.5 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Unfortunately, TEGNA's EBIT flopped 17% over the last four quarters. If that sort of decline is not arrested, then the managing its debt will be harder than selling broccoli flavoured ice-cream for a premium. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if TEGNA can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
TEGNA的債務是其EBITDA的3.3倍,其EBIT可以覆蓋其利息支出4.5倍。這表明,雖然債務水平相當高,但我們並不認爲這會成爲問題。不幸的是,TEGNA的EBIT在過去四個季度下降了17%。如果這種下降沒有得到遏制,那麼管理其債務將比以溢價出售西蘭花味冰淇淋更困難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個好的起點。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定TEGNA是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。所以,如果你想看到專業人士的看法,可能會覺得這份關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, TEGNA recorded free cash flow worth 77% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
但是我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要真實的現金。因此,檢查EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的值得。 在過去三年中,TEGNA記錄的自由現金流佔其EBIT的77%,這是正常的,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。這筆真實的現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Mulling over TEGNA's attempt at (not) growing its EBIT, we're certainly not enthusiastic. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that TEGNA's debt is making it a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example TEGNA has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are significant) we think you should know about.
考慮到TEGNA在(不)增長其EBIT方面的努力,我們並不太感興趣。 但至少它在將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流方面做得相當不錯;這讓人感到鼓舞。 一旦我們考慮到上述所有因素,我們認爲TEGNA的債務使其有些風險。這未必是壞事,但我們通常會對較少的槓桿感到更舒服。 在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是要關注的領域。 但最終,每家公司可能都存在超出資產負債表的風險。 例如,TEGNA有4個警告信號(其中2個是重要的),我們認爲你應該知道。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。