share_log

Earnings Growth of 1.0% Over 3 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for Lear (NYSE:LEA) Shareholders

Earnings Growth of 1.0% Over 3 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for Lear (NYSE:LEA) Shareholders

李爾(紐交所:LEA)股東在三年內盈利增長1.0%仍未能轉化爲正回報。
Simply Wall St ·  12/18 22:45

As an investor its worth striving to ensure your overall portfolio beats the market average. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. We regret to report that long term Lear Corporation (NYSE:LEA) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 45% in three years, versus a market return of about 28%. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 33% in a year. The falls have accelerated recently, with the share price down 12% in the last three months.

作爲投資者,努力確保您的整體投資組合超越市場平均水平是值得的。但股票選擇的風險在於,您可能會購買表現不佳的公司。我們遺憾地報告,長揸李爾公司(紐交所:LEA)股票的股東經歷了這樣的情況,股價在三年內下跌了45%,而市場回報約爲28%。最近的消息更令人無法安慰,股價在一年內下跌了33%。最近股價下跌的速度加快,在過去三個月內股價下跌了12%。

Given the past week has been tough on shareholders, let's investigate the fundamentals and see what we can learn.

鑑於過去一週對股東來說很艱難,讓我們調查一下基本面,看看我們能學到什麼。

While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

雖然市場是一種強大的定價機制,但股價反映的是投資者情緒,而不僅僅是基礎業務表現。查看公司股價與每股收益(EPS)之間的互動,可以檢視市場情緒是如何隨時間而變化的。

During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, Lear actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 3.0% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

在這三年股價下跌的不幸期間,李爾的每股收益(EPS)實際上每年改善了3.0%。考慮到股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑在此期間,EPS並不是商業表現的良好指標(可能由於一次性的損失或收益)。或者,公司在過去被過於炒作,因此其增長令人失望。

It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. However, taking a look at other business metrics might shed a bit more light on the share price action.

在我們看來,市場可能在三年前對增長過於樂觀。然而,查看其他業務指標可能會對股價走勢提供更多的啓示。

We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 8.3% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Lear more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

我們注意到,在三年內,營業收入實際上以8.3%的年增長率增長,因此這似乎不是賣出股份的理由。此次分析只是例行公事,但可能值得更仔細研究李爾,因爲有時股票的下跌並不公平。這可能提供了一個機會。

The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下面的圖像顯示了收益和營業收入隨時間的變化情況(如果點擊圖像,可以看到更詳細的信息)。

big
NYSE:LEA Earnings and Revenue Growth December 18th 2024
紐交所:LEA 每股收益和營業收入增長 2024年12月18日

Lear is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. Given we have quite a good number of analyst forecasts, it might be well worth checking out this free chart depicting consensus estimates.

李爾在投資者中很知名,很多聰明的分析師試圖預測未來的利潤水平。鑑於我們有相當多的分析師預測,查看這張描繪共識估計的免費圖表可能非常值得。

What About Dividends?

關於分紅派息的問題

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Lear, it has a TSR of -40% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是考慮總股東回報(TSR)與股價回報之間的區別。TSR是一種回報計算,考慮了現金分紅的價值(假設任何收到的分紅都是再投資的)以及任何折扣融資和分拆的計算價值。因此,對於那些支付豐厚分紅的公司,TSR往往遠高於股價回報。就李爾而言,過去3年它的TSR爲-40%。這超過了我們之前提到的股價回報。而且毫無疑問,分紅支付在很大程度上解釋了這一差異!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Lear shareholders are down 31% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 28%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 5% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example - Lear has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

李爾的股東今年下跌了31%(即使包括分紅派息),但市場本身上漲了28%。即使是表現良好的股票,有時也會下跌,但我們希望在對業務產生濃厚興趣之前,看到其基本指標的改善。很遺憾,去年的表現終結了一段糟糕的運行,股東在過去五年中面臨的總虧損爲每年5%。一般來說,長期股價疲軟可能是一個壞兆頭,儘管逆向投資者可能希望通過研究這隻股票來期待反彈。雖然考慮市場條件對股價的不同影響是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,風險 - 我們認爲李爾有2個警告信號,您應該注意。

Of course Lear may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

當然,李爾可能不是最適合買入的股票。因此,您可能希望查看這份免費的成長股票集合。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在美國交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論