Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (NYSE:HP) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
一些人說波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過「波動性遠非與風險同義詞」。當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡查看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,赫爾默裏奇和佩恩材料(紐交所:HP)也使用債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務造成了多少風險?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務幫助企業,直到企業無法償還它,或者通過新資本或自由現金流。資本主義的一部分是「創造性破壞」的過程,失敗的企業被他們的銀行家無情清算。雖然這並不太常見,但我們經常看到負債公司因爲債權人迫使他們以困境價格籌集資金而永久稀釋股東。話雖如此,最常見的情況是,企業能夠合理管理債務,並從中獲益。考慮一家企業使用多少債務時,第一件要做的事是查看其現金和債務的結合。
How Much Debt Does Helmerich & Payne Carry?
赫爾默裏奇和佩恩材料負債多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Helmerich & Payne had US$1.78b of debt, an increase on US$545.1m, over one year. However, it also had US$510.3m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.27b.
您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數字,但它顯示截至2024年9月,赫爾默裏奇和佩恩材料的債務爲17.8億美元,比1年前的54510萬美元有所增加。然而,它的現金爲51030萬美元,因此其淨債務爲12.7億美元。
How Healthy Is Helmerich & Payne's Balance Sheet?
赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的資產負債表健康嗎?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Helmerich & Payne had liabilities of US$446.9m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$2.42b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$510.3m and US$429.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$1.92b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
在最新的資產負債表數據中,我們可以看到赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的負債爲44690萬美元,12個月內到期的負債爲24.2億。另一方面,它有51030萬美元的現金和42990萬美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收款的總和多出19.2億。
Helmerich & Payne has a market capitalization of US$3.26b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的市場資本化爲32.6億,因此如果有必要,它很可能籌集現金來改善其資產負債表。然而,仔細研究其償債能力仍然是值得的。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過看淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何輕鬆地覆蓋利息費用(利息覆蓋)來衡量一家公司相對於其獲利能力的債務負擔。這樣,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量,也考慮了其支付的利率。
We'd say that Helmerich & Payne's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.5), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its strong interest cover of 1k times, makes us even more comfortable. But the bad news is that Helmerich & Payne has seen its EBIT plunge 15% in the last twelve months. We think hat kind of performance, if repeated frequently, could well lead to difficulties for the stock. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Helmerich & Payne can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
我們認爲赫爾默裏奇和佩恩中等的淨債務與EBITDA比率(爲1.5)表明在債務方面的謹慎。而且其強勁的利息覆蓋率爲0.1萬倍,讓我們更加安心。但壞消息是赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的EBIT在過去12個月中下跌了15%。我們認爲這種表現如果頻繁出現,可能會導致股票面臨困難。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定赫爾默裏奇和佩恩能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你專注於未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,顯示分析師的盈利預測。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Helmerich & Payne produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;僅僅依靠會計利潤是不夠的。所以我們顯然需要查看EBIT是否帶來了相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,赫爾默裏奇和佩恩產生了相當於其EBIT 58%的強勁自由現金流,正是我們所期望的。這筆現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Helmerich & Payne's EBIT growth rate and level of total liabilities definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able to cover its interest expense with its EBIT with ease. We think that Helmerich & Payne's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Helmerich & Payne (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的EBIT增長率和總負債水平確實對其產生影響。不過,好消息是,它似乎可以輕鬆地用EBIT來償還利息費用。我們認爲,赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的債務確實讓它有些風險,考慮到前述數據點。雖然這不一定是壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本收益率,但這是需要注意的事情。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解到大部分債務。然而,並非所有投資風險都源於資產負債表——遠非如此。例如,我們發現了赫爾默裏奇和佩恩的3個警告信號(其中一個讓我們很不舒服!),在你投資之前需要注意這些。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,請查看這個自由名單,其中列出了在資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。