Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Radius Recycling, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDUS) Recent US$52m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Radius Recycling, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDUS) Recent US$52m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Radius Recycling's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着Radius Recycling的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前十大股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Radius Recycling, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDUS) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
觀察Radius Recycling, Inc. (納斯達克:RDUS) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到機構在公司中持有83%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的收益(如果出現下跌則損失最大)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$490m last week after a 9.7% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 39% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in Radius Recycling's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
因此,機構投資者是受到影響最大的群體,因爲上週公司的市值在股價下跌9.7%後降至49000萬美元。這些投資者可能特別關注當前的損失,這使股東一年的損失達到了39%。機構通常被稱爲「聰明錢」,它們對股票價格的波動具有很大的影響力。因此,如果Radius Recycling的股價弱勢持續,機構投資者可能會感到有必要賣出該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Radius Recycling, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討Radius Recycling的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Radius Recycling?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Radius Recycling什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Radius Recycling. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Radius Recycling's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Radius Recycling中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作分析師已關注該股票,並且他們對其表示認可。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有同一只股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相迅速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Radius Recycling的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,仍然還有更多故事等待發現。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Radius Recycling. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 7.6% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 6.6% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Tamara Lundgren is the owner of 3.8% of the company's shares.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以集體發揮重要的影響力。對Radius Recycling,對沖基金並沒有持有很多股票。貝萊德(BlackRock,Inc.)目前是公司最大的股東,擁有12%的流通股。哥倫比亞管理投資顧問公司(Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC)是第二大股東,持有7.6%的普通股,維度基金顧問(Dimensional Fund Advisors LP)持有大約6.6%的公司股票。此外,首席執行官塔瑪拉·倫德格倫(Tamara Lundgren)擁有公司3.8%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了一些深入調查,發現十大股東大約佔註冊股份的50%,這意味着除了大股東之外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
研究機構的持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但隨着時間的發展,它仍然有可能變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Radius Recycling
Radius Recycling的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Radius Recycling, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$490m, and insiders have US$30m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,Radius Recycling, Inc. 的內部人士確實擁有股份。它的市值僅爲49000萬美元,內部人士手中有價值3000萬美元的股份。有人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在出售股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Radius Recycling. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆持有10%的股份,主要由個別投資者組成,對Radius Recycling有一定的影響力。雖然這樣的持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Radius Recycling has 4 warning signs (and 3 which are a bit concerning) we think you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 舉個例子,風險 - Radius Recycling 有 4 個警告信號(還有 3 個讓人稍微擔憂的信號),我們認爲你應該了解這些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。