Retail Investors Who Hold 52% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:AUPH) Gained 5.5%, Institutions Profited as Well
Retail Investors Who Hold 52% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:AUPH) Gained 5.5%, Institutions Profited as Well
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Aurinia Pharmaceuticals by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 40% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Institutions own 40% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
- 散戶投資者對Aurinia Pharmaceuticals的重大控制權意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更大的影響力。
- 前25位股東持有該業務40%的股份。
- 機構持有Aurinia Pharmaceuticals 40%的股份。
Every investor in Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:AUPH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 52% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.(納斯達克:AUPH)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。散戶投資者以52%的股份擁有公司最多的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最多的收益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$72m market cap gain, institutions too had a 40% share in those profits.
雖然散戶投資者是上週7200萬美元市值增長中受益最大的一群,但機構也佔有40%的利潤份額。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals.
在下面的圖表中,我們將目光集中在Aurinia Pharmaceuticals的不同持有群體上。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aurinia Pharmaceuticals?
機構持有率告訴我們關於aurinia pharmaceuticals什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals已經在股東登記冊上有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司的持股比例相當可觀。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一點,因爲機構有時候也會做出糟糕的投資,正如每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們參與『擁擠交易』的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競爭快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險會更高。你可以在下面看到Aurinia Pharmaceuticals的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的故事。
It looks like hedge funds own 5.7% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
看起來對沖基金持有Aurinia Pharmaceuticals 5.7%的股份。這很有意思,因爲對沖基金通常會相當活躍並且具有激進性。許多人尋找中期催化劑以推動股價上漲。 我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有6.3%的流通股份。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.9%和5.7%的流通股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
aurinia pharmaceuticals的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$20m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.的股票。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重大對齊通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有約2000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人士對齊的問題,您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 52% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有Aurinia Pharmaceuticals 52%的股份。這樣的持有比例賦予來自更廣泛公衆的投資者在董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例等關鍵政策決策中一定的影響力。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡深入了解一個公司過去的表現。您可以在這個詳細的圖表中找到歷史營業收入和盈利。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。