share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有83%股份的快扣公司(納斯達克:FAST)受到機構投資者的強烈主導。
Simply Wall St ·  12/16 23:02

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Fastenal implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 22 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在快扣的重大持有意味着它們對公司股價有顯著影響。
  • 前22大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着快扣公司(納斯達克:FAST),重要的是要理解其業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有83%的股份,換句話說,這個集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或遭受最大的損失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Fastenal.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關快扣的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqGS:FAST Ownership Breakdown December 16th 2024
納斯達克:FASt 股權結構 2024年12月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fastenal?

機構持股量告訴我們關於Fastenal的信息。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Fastenal already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Fastenal, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

快扣已經在股權登記上有機構。確實,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。不過,最好對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持謹慎。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看快扣過去的收益軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:FAST Earnings and Revenue Growth December 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:FASt 2024年12月16日的盈利和營收增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Fastenal is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 8.2% and 4.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。快扣並不被對沖基金持有。目前,先鋒集團是公司的最大股東,擁有13%的流通股份。貝萊德和道富銀行全球顧問分別是第二和第三大股東,持有8.2%和4.9%的流通股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的深挖,我們發現前22名股東對公司的合計持股爲50%,這表明沒有任何單一股東對公司擁有顯著控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Fastenal

Fastenal內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our information suggests that Fastenal Company insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$83m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,快扣公司的內部人士持有不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模較大,我們不期望內部人士持有股票的較大比例。他們共同持有價值8300萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,查看這些內部人士是買入還是賣出可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Fastenal. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有快扣17%的股份。 這種規模的持有可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然能夠對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fastenal better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但是爲了更好地理解快扣,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張互動圖表,查看過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論