NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 65% of the Company
NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 65% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies NIKE's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders own 21% of NIKE
- 顯著較高的機構持股意味着耐克的股價對他們的交易行爲很敏感
- 共有14位投資者在公司中擁有大多數股份,持股比例爲50%
- 內部人士持有耐克21%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 65% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制耐克公司(紐交所:NKE),重要的是要理解該業務的股權結構。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔65%,是機構。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到他們掌握的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有重要影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,投資於公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of NIKE, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討耐克每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NIKE?
機構所有權告訴我們關於耐克什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
NIKE already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NIKE, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
耐克已經在股份登記上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會錯。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不少見。因此,查看耐克過去的盈利趨勢是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in NIKE. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Philip Knight (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 18% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。我們注意到對耐克的對沖基金投資並不顯著。根據我們的數據,我們推測最大的股東是菲利普·奈特(同時擔任首席執行官),持有18%的流通股份。一般來說,內部人士持有公司大量股份被視爲好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士扮演關鍵股東的角色。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.4%和6.2%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地查看我們的持股數據表明,前14位股東的合計持股比例爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of NIKE
耐克的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in NIKE, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$115b, and insiders have US$24b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士在耐克公司持有大量股份。公司的市值只有1150億美元,而內部人士自己名下的股份價值240億美元。這相當可觀。看到這種投資水平令人欣慰。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否最近有購買。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in NIKE. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,在耐克公司持有14%的股份。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NIKE better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得思考擁有公司股票的不同群體。但要更好地理解耐克,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張互動圖表,查看過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。