share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After UiPath Inc.'s (NYSE:PATH) Latest 5.4% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After UiPath Inc.'s (NYSE:PATH) Latest 5.4% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

機構投資者可能會在UiPath Inc.(紐交所:PATH)最新下跌5.4%後採取嚴厲措施,因爲這加大了今年的虧損。
Simply Wall St ·  12/15 21:38

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in UiPath implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • 21% of UiPath is held by insiders
  • 機構在UiPath的大量持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有顯著影響。
  • 51%的業務由前11名股東持有。
  • 21%的UiPath股份由內部人士持有。

Every investor in UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 57% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每個投資者在UiPath Inc.(紐交所:PATH)都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構以57%的股份擁有公司最多的股票。因此,這個群體在股票上漲時最有可能獲益(或者在出現下跌時損失最多)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 5.4% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 45% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in UiPath's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

在上週公司股價下跌5.4%後,機構投資者承受了最大的損失。最近的虧損,加上股東一年內45%的虧損,可能不會讓這組投資者感到滿意。機構常被稱爲「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有重要的力量。因此,如果UiPath的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到被迫賣出該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of UiPath.

在下面的圖表中,我們詳細觀察UiPath的不同持股群體。

big
NYSE:PATH Ownership Breakdown December 15th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PATH 持股分佈 2024年12月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UiPath?

機構持股告訴我們關於UiPath什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that UiPath does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at UiPath's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到UiPath確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這可以表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽。然而,最好還是小心依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時候也會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看下面UiPath的盈利歷史是很值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:PATH Earnings and Revenue Growth December 15th 2024
紐交所:PATH 2024年12月15日的盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in UiPath. The company's CEO Daniel Dines is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. With 8.4% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對沖基金在UiPath中的持股不多。 公司的首席執行官丹尼爾·迪尼斯是最大股東,持有20%的流通股份。 先鋒集團和日興資產管理公司分別是第二和第三大股東,持有8.4%和5.2%的流通股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到51%的股份由前11大股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of UiPath

UiPath的內幕持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of UiPath Inc.. Insiders own US$1.6b worth of shares in the US$7.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有UiPath Inc.相當合理的股份。內部人士持有價值16億美金的股份,而這家公司的市值爲77億美金。這相當重要。看到這種投資水平很不錯。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in UiPath. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有UiPath 22%的股份。儘管這個持有比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with UiPath , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,始終存在的投資風險。 我們已識別出UiPath的一個警告信號,理解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論