Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as QXO, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:QXO) Recent 7.2% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as QXO, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:QXO) Recent 7.2% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies QXO's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 5 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著的機構持有比例意味着QXO的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
- 前五大股東持有公司54%的股份
- 公司的過往表現以及所有權數據有助於強烈判斷業務的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of QXO, Inc. (NASDAQ:QXO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 63% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着QXO, Inc.(納斯達克:QXO),理解公司所有權結構是很重要的。 持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔63%,是機構。 也就是說,該群體在股票上漲時最能受益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$512m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 72% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell QXO, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
結果是,上週機構投資者承受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了51200萬美元。 這一組投資者可能特別關心當前的損失,這增加了股東一年內72%的損失。 通常被稱爲「市場推動者」,機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面具有重要的權力。 因此,如果下跌趨勢持續,機構可能面臨賣出 QXO 的壓力,這可能對個人投資者產生負面影響。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of QXO.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細看一下 QXO 的不同持有群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About QXO?
機構持有對 QXO 有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that QXO does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of QXO, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到 QXO 確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某隻股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看 QXO 過去的盈利趨勢是值得的(參見下文)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 18% of QXO shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Orbis Investment Management Limited, with ownership of 27%. MFN Partners Management, LP is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Finepoint Capital LP holds about 6.7% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。看起來對沖基金持有18%的上一季度的股票。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司的最大股東是Orbis Investment Management Limited,擁有27%的股份。MFN Partners Management, LP是第二大股東,持有11%的普通股,而Finepoint Capital LP持有公司股票的約6.7%。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了公司的大約54%由前五大股東控制,這表明這些股東對業務具有重大影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。該股票有一些分析師覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它仍然可能變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of QXO
關於QXO的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of QXO, Inc. in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$7.4m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義擁有QXO, Inc.不足1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值740萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例股份更重要。可以說,近期的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over QXO. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆擁有19%的股份,主要由個人投資者構成,因而對QXO有一定程度的影響力。雖然如此大的持股可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然能夠在公司政策上產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for QXO that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮公司擁有者的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我們發現了 QXO 的兩個警告信號,在此投資之前你應該意識到這些。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。