Painful Week for Retail Investors Invested in CapitaLand India Trust (SGX:CY6U) After 6.1% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses
Painful Week for Retail Investors Invested in CapitaLand India Trust (SGX:CY6U) After 6.1% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over CapitaLand India Trust by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
- Institutions own 35% of CapitaLand India Trust
- 零售投資者對CapitaLand印度信託的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上擁有更多的影響力
- 前25大股東擁有公司49%的股份。
- 機構擁有35%的CapitaLand印度信託
Every investor in CapitaLand India Trust (SGX:CY6U) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位投資者在CapitaLand印度信託(新加坡交易所:CY6U)中都應該意識到最強大的股東集團。 持有該公司最多股份的集團,大約佔48%,是零售投資者。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While institutions who own 35% came under pressure after market cap dropped to S$1.4b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
雖然擁有35%的機構在市值上週降至14億新元后感受到壓力,散戶投資者遭受的損失最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CapitaLand India Trust, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解CapitaLand印度信託的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CapitaLand India Trust?
機構所有權告訴我們關於CapitaLand印度信託什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CapitaLand India Trust. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CapitaLand India Trust, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在CapitaLand印度信託中擁有相當數量的股份。這暗示着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經審視了這隻股票,並對此表示看好。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。因此,如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不少見。因此,查看CapitaLand印度信託的過去盈利軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CapitaLand India Trust. Our data shows that Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 3.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對CapitaLand印度信託的對沖基金投資並不顯著。我們的數據顯示,Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd.是最大的股東,持有17%的流通股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.4%和3.8%的流通股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of CapitaLand India Trust
CapitaLand印度信託的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CapitaLand India Trust in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$5.3m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人員以自己名義持有的CapitaLand印度信託公司股份不足1%。但他們可能通過我們尚未發現的公司結構間接持有股份。請記住,這是一家大型企業,內部人員持有價值530萬新元的股票。絕對值可能比比例股份更重要。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 48% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有公司48%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能決策,但他們確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 17%, of the CapitaLand India Trust stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎私人公司擁有凱德印度信託17%的股票。這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬人公司有興趣,這應該在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CapitaLand India Trust better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for CapitaLand India Trust (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.
考慮不同的股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解凱德印度信託,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現凱德印度信託的3個警告信號(其中1個不容忽視!)你應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。