With 75% Ownership, Upwork Inc. (NASDAQ:UPWK) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 75% Ownership, Upwork Inc. (NASDAQ:UPWK) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Upwork's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着Upwork的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前10大股東持有51%的業務。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
If you want to know who really controls Upwork Inc. (NASDAQ:UPWK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 75% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了Upwork Inc.(納斯達克:UPWK),那麼你必須查看其股權登記的構成。機構持有75%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利益(或者在出現下跌時損失最多)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構能夠接觸到大量資金,他們的市場動作往往受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,公司中擁有大量機構資金的投資通常被視爲一種可取的特質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Upwork, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Upwork的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Upwork?
機構持股對upwork有何啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Upwork does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Upwork's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Upwork確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師們已經研究過這隻股票,並且他們看好它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得關注一下Upwork的盈利歷史,當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 5.5% of Upwork shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 7.6% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Hayden Brown directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。現有數據顯示,5.5%的Upwork股份由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能相當活躍且具有激進性。許多基金尋求中期催化劑,以推動股價上漲。先鋒集團目前是公司最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。而第二和第三大的股東,則分別持有約11%和7.6%的股票。此外,公司首席執行官海登·布朗直接持有0.9%的總流通股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前十大股東佔股份登記的一半以上,還有一些較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Upwork
upwork內部股權所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Upwork Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$166m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東們可能會對管理層擁有Upwork Inc.的股份感興趣。管理層擁有價值16600萬美元的可觀股份。大多數人會認爲這是個積極的跡象。看到管理層有這樣的投資水平是好的。您可以在這裏查看這些管理層最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Upwork. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Upwork 13%的股份。儘管這個所有權比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同,可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營業收入和收益的免費圖表來查看。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。