Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Organon's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由於機構在股票中持有大量股份,Organon的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 共有16位投資者在公司中持有51%的控股權。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
Every investor in Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN)的投資者都應關注最強大的股東群體。機構持有公司81%的股份,是持股最多的股東。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構能夠接觸到大量資金,他們的市場動作往往受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,公司中擁有大量機構資金的投資通常被視爲一種可取的特質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Organon, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Organon的每一種所有者類型,首先看下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Organon?
機構持有情況告訴我們關於Organon什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Organon. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Organon's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Organon中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們對它很看好。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Organon的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Organon. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 3.8% of the stock.
機構投資者持有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可能會強有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到對Organon並沒有顯著的對沖基金投資。根據我們的數據,最大股東是貝萊德,持有12%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約12%和3.8%的股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看看我們的所有權數據,顯示前16大股東的合計持股爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Organon
Organon的內部人持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our information suggests that Organon & Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$9.1m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,Organon & Co.的內部人士擁有不到1%的公司股份。 這是一家大公司,因此即使是少量的持股比例也能在董事會和股東之間形成一致的利益。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值910萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在持續買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Organon. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆持有19%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對Organon有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體並不一定能決定一切,但他們確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Organon has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現研究一個公司的實際擁有者非常有趣。然而,要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——我們認爲Organon存在2個警告信號,您應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。